Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Red Palette Art - Merch Shop

Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!

Description

Remember everyone, when two members of the same sex are near, that does not mean they are homosexuals. Sometimes people are just friends, and sometimes a children’s cartoon is just a children’s cartoon.

safe2281644 screencap303146 pinkie pie267252 real article37 earth pony552020 pony1715131 g42138434 my little pony: friendship is magic268546 the gift of the maud pie1066 background pony12798 john candy25 meme97125 meta18888 neighl page44 not gay243 planes trains and automobiles39 politics1951 ponies standing next to each other225 rage1834 shipping denied1032 shipping goggles26 steve martin34 text97815 train3685 tv-y395
Source

Comments

Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ ~sub~

Detailed syntax guide

deactivated9659a69

Actually, yeah, a lot of people do interpret homosexuality where there is none. We are allowed to sit next to someone of the same gender, right? We’re allowed to be FRIENDS with them, right? Friendship is magic.
thevideonasty

We got a soup! soup!
What interpretation though? They’re ponifications of existing characters, one with a wife, and one with a deceased wife who’s death he’s not taking too well.
Background Pony #2B3A
Anyway, on a different tack, I sorta hope someone gets one of those anti-gay organizations up in arms over this; it’d be fun to watch their reaction when everyone laughs at them for not getting the reference.
Background Pony #5DBD
@Exedrus
 
@Brony_Conundrum
 
Ok since a Mod has showed up again, I’m just gonna say “I don’t agree with you but you can believe what you want.” just please don’t reply to me again, I will otherwise regard it as some mad fervor to convert the heretic.
Background Pony #5DBD
@Exedrus  
That doesn’t change what the authors intend, though.
 
It’s hard to believe this all occurred because someone thought two characters were gay when they were not. The characters are from a movie, so we know that the author intention was that they were representations of two movie characters, not two gay people. Do you see what I’m getting at?