Uploaded by Background Pony #8A17
1280x989 JPG 175 kBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
Poor Twi, all those new experiences in one day.
Tags
+-SH safe2266638 +-SH artist:silfoe1576 +-SH twilight sparkle371189 +-SH oc997713 +-SH oc:eventide glisten64 +-SH alicorn335709 +-SH pony1699011 +-SH other royal book191 +-SH g42126171 +-SH alicorn oc38133 +-SH baby17443 +-SH baby pony9727 +-SH black and white18720 +-SH breast milk5991 +-SH breastfeeding1540 +-SH canon x oc36800 +-SH cute279919 +-SH dialogue100073 +-SH diaper17583 +-SH female1907977 +-SH foal53362 +-SH grayscale51938 +-SH horses doing horse things1567 +-SH lactation8061 +-SH magical lesbian spawn16043 +-SH mama twilight1233 +-SH mare805438 +-SH monochrome180366 +-SH mother and daughter9146 +-SH nonsexual nursing149 +-SH nudity544549 +-SH nursing272 +-SH offspring51677 +-SH parent:princess luna3174 +-SH parent:twilight sparkle10614 +-SH parents:twiluna427 +-SH simple background638294 +-SH sketch87550 +-SH speech bubble44004 +-SH suckling3935 +-SH twilight sparkle (alicorn)154801 +-SH white background177070 +-SH wide eyes20405
Loading...
Loading...
Well, to be fair, one of those is a fully grown adult who doesn’t need to be fed. It’s probably not exactly the same experience xD .
Edited
!
Damn, you could say you’re triggered. Anyways, it’s done so.. ye.
Edited
Nope, it’s highly fetishised in Japan. Seriously, Japan is more into porn than the U.S. is. The U.S. comes into second next to Japan.
Mods killed that tag forever since it only attracted shitposters while hiding actual pics.
Not entirely It’s a morality nature and a body nature.
It’s body nature to feed the baby with breastmilk, otherwise they will get sick or starved.
But it’s a morality nature to accept that as a fact, as a rule and don’t bash woman when she does that in public.
so what you’re saying is you actually mean “polite” instead of “natural”
You got some issues, buddy.
I’m talking about social morality standarts ‘kindoff natural.
Its’a morality, that kind of naturality that makes people, people.
Like you will release your butt from the bus seat if pregnant lady or elder is standing near you, if your not a moron.
Plus this is about nurture and traditions of the people. Russians are really on traditionalist side.
Like on dates that would be a nonsense for girl to pay for anything.
It’s of course forbidden to hit women, even for policemen. They’ll get in big trouble for this.
So breastfeeding here consider as a ‘natural’ act, and things that you discribed as natural stuff…. I fill sorry for you)
Edited
Good.
Else the
drama in the comments
tag gets added.Kind of missed my point. This isn’t about people enjoying “primitive” stuff. I dislike the natural argument because it’s like saying chemicals are bad because they are chemicals, even though everything is chemicals. Same as everything is natural. This is about the ignorance of what they are actually arguing for. The only things that aren’t natural are things artificially created that literally cannot exist naturally. But even then, those kinds of things were created by humans. And guess what? Humans are natural.
I guess you could say I got “triggered”. I don’t even know why this is upsetting me. I truly don’t. It just does for some reason.
Anyways, let’s just forget I said anything. I shouldn’t have started this. It does not add anything to the comment section and I wish to end it before it gets out of hand. Agreed?
@Eeveeinheat
Way to let yourself go over there, buddy.
Listen, i know the fact that one day technology will surpass natural behaviours in body efficiency. But for now, we have to stick with what we got.
As said below, people who admire “natural” stuff aren’t all primitivists. They just feel comfortable and happy around some stuff they deem natural, and it doesn’t necessarily have to be literally all kinds of natural stuff, such as killing and raping (i don’t know where you got that from) and bleeding. It’s just that technology has chipped off most corporally demanding things, such as the ones mentioned before, and given us space for our more harmless bodily functions.
Edited
I can understand your rant, but most of the time when people like breastfeeding because “it’s natural”, they’re not immediately saying we should go back to being cavemen. It’s just that we’re often forgetting our little natural, already-packaged-with-us things with time.
Killing is natural, hunting is natural, but these things require a lot of effort. Breastfeeding, not so much, just let the mother put her baby’s mouth near her nipple and voila.
[hq]Breastfeeding is a natural act[/hq]
Never, and I repeat, NEVER use this form of logic. Appeal to nature is a fallacy that is pointless because of how hypocritical it is. It’s pretty much the wild card of arguments because everyone uses it for everything. “This is natural, so it must be good!” “This is unnatural, so it must be bad!” “This is wrong because I feel it is wrong, but I will use the appeal to nature fallacy to make my non-argument work!”. But one single phrase brings it all crashing down: rape is natural.
Heck, everything we find wrong and horrifying in the world is natural. Torture? Natural. Laying eggs in a creature to be slowly eaten alive for ten days straight? Natural. Parents eating some of their babies so they have more resources available for the stronger ones? Natural.
So yes, this picture is perfectly fine. Not because “it’s natural”, but because the majority feel it should be fine. That there really isn’t anything that most reasonable people find wrong with it. But please, for future reference, do not use nature in any argument. Even if it’s a small part.
Sorry for the rant. This is one of my greatest pet peeves because it symbolizes a lot of what is wrong in this world. How people say things just to back up their points, not because it truly does back up their points. This leads to much double-think. It’s an argument that EVERYONE, EVERYWHERE has been using for as long as humanity has existed. And it just doesn’t hold water.
PS: This wasn’t really about you or the breastfeeding thing, just the appeal to nature fallacy in general. It truly does push my buttons.
In my limited experience with it, it doesn’t bother people so much if the mom has the baby (and her chest) covered when she does it.
Good Call! :)
In America it’s a tad different…
Americans seem to find it gross and rude to take your breast out in public places to feed your baby. Calling it ‘disgusting’ and that they should be ashamed of what they’re doing.
Not all Americans seem to think this… but when you see how many react this way, it’s kinda sad.
Breastfeeding is a natural act, and it had to be done even in public. You can’t tell a baby to narrow the belt and wait for few hours.
None will criticize mother for doing this on public, but they will criticize the person who would dare to criticize such lady.
(At least that’s how it is in Russia))
Thank you.
talked about it with the other mods, and this particular image at least is safe
There is quite simply nothing to see that even remotely looks like a breast / teat.
Only the foals position and stance suggests she is being fed by her mother, o well.