General Tag Discussion

So what’s the tag for physical hearts now that ‘love heart’ and heart have apparently been aliased?  
Also, it seems odd that with this new merging (well, I’m assuming it’s new, I just noticed it) floating heart still implies ‘heart’ rather than being merged with it.

@Dragonpone  
The organ tag is heart (organ)  
I’m working on the descriptions to point to eachother. [I could have sword I already did the description for the organ tag… huh.]
 
I switched up the tags because too many people were just tagging “heart” instead of “love heart”. So I just moved the organ to an organ tag and put love heart into heart.
 
As for the others:  
floating heart, heart hoof, heart pillow, heart print underwear
 
I’m thinking those can be fine staying on their own. They’re still describing individual things.

@Background Pony #8919  
DAMN ANONYMOUS BUTTON!
 
That’s it. Turning it off and never using that again. Bigger headache than just pushing the button myself each time. >=I

@Zeb  
Alrighty then. Thanks!

My first time to enter this discussion. In which I’d start with…
 
Just found this image tagged both Suggestive and Questionable, but that’s impossible. Which rating fits? I’d might go with Questionable.  

@RushCars24  
There’s nothing like cameltoe or other things that’d make the questionable rating a no-brainer, leaving just “implied nudity.” That tag has plenty of suggestive images - in fact, more suggestive than questionable - and this is one of the tamer examples. I see no reason why this shouldn’t be tagged suggestive.

@Dragonpone  
@Zeb  
Huh, didn’t know floating heart was a thing, I only ever tagged love heart. I guess I’m not the only one, considering how severely undertagged that tag is…

 
Would this count as wrong eye color? The source says it’s supposed to be sepia tone, but then there’s the green and pink…

@Background Pony #EC55  

 
If it’s supposed top be sepia but has some colored elements, then I’d use Partial Color.

OK I think this tag isn’t aliasing properly.
 
Stormshadow implies tempest shadow, and Tempest also implies the movie tags, but it seems that when I upload a pic and add in stormshadow, it add Tempest Shadow to the tags, but not the movie spoilers.
 
Is it supposed ot be like that?

@ice1517  

 
Yes and no. Yes, because the tagging system doesn’t support chain implications. No, because the movie tag implications should have been added to the first tag together with the Tempest Shadow implication.

@Yoshimon1  
So the soloution would be to have stormshadow imply the movie tags?

@ice1517  
@Yoshimon1  
My bad. I had missed that.
 
Fixed~

@Zeb  
You missed out a tag for something related to my waifu >:(
 
You should be ashamed of yourself.

Should pics that were created from livestream use the “livestream” tag? Examples: >>1502918 (deleted), >>1275216, >>1253376, or should only images such as >>1306500, >>1299857, >>1207395 (nsfw) that show the act of streaming use them? Also how about pics that tell viewers about an ongoing stream like >>1219388?

Someone should give the chrysaluna tag the implied tags and add it to the Luna and Chrysalis tag.

@ice1517  
Shame upon me! D=
 

@Zeb  
Apologise to edge wiafu and edge bat right now mister >:(

@Zeb  

 
_{I can think of some users who might as well have this as their profile image.}

@Dragonpone  
I’m not one of them, am I? ;~;

@Background Pony #A8E1  
I would think that only the images that display a livestream, or directly reference one [like the announcement images] would need the tag. The others would just be regular images.
 
@Meanlucario  
Done. Just know for future reference that shipping tags should be posted in the Shipping Tags General
 
@ice1517  
I don’t think Tempest is so forgiving…  

@ice1517  
Not that I know of. You’re good. c:

@Zeb  
I did, but didn’t think that had much tagging power outside of creating the tags.

@Zeb  
Say you are sorry for derping up, and she will only bite off 2 fingers instead of 3. :3
 
 
@Dragonpone  
Yay :3

@Zeb  
Alright. Thinking of creating a tag for those “drawn” livestreams (>>1306500, >>1299857, >>1207395). Would “parody livestream” work, or “fake livestream”?