Yes, the site logo changed. This is because site stylesheets are all brand-spanking new, and we have 15 new themes for you to choose from! More info here.
Policy Update - Rules changes incoming for AI content - Read Here
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Techy Cutie Pony Collection!

Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!

Description

The fuckin’ juxtaposition of the two images at the source, lmao.
 
Prompt: Sweetie Belle.

suggestive197664 artist:moonatik1667 sweetie belle58761 pony1708169 g42133028 30 minute art challenge8066 chair12822 change my mind126 comments locked down544 discussion in the comments843 explicit source4989 female1917075 filly105498 foal54063 implied foalcon1791 implied masturbation1134 implied pedophilia57 magic102333 meme96931 mouthpiece1365 mug6757 smug10025 solo1511002 steven crowder35 table14122 vulgar26295

Comments

Background Pony #4D73
@DarkyBoode32
If the ponies are anthropomorphised/have human traits (which they most certainly do/are), then by logic if someone is attracted to foals in MLP they can most certainly be considered a pedophile, as the characters in question share traits/characteristics with human children by design, far more so than actual equine
(not that that would make it any better really).
Take the CMC (oh god not literally), they behave, speak and are specifically written to be as identifiable/relatable to the shows intended demographic, children 3 to 12, not actual horses but human kids.
Those “people” who are sexually attracted to them and the other underage ponies from this franchise is 9 times out of 10 that the foals in question resemble adolescent prepubescent human children and not actual livestock…
All the cognitive dissonance and desperate desperate denial can’t change the intent of the the shows creators to draw them as anthropomorphised children neither does it change how these pedophiles, yes pedophiles, are attracted to them for that very reason.
Thoughts?
Background Pony #8E94
Disagree. People who like foalcon are actually equuleophiles not pedophiles. Some people in this fandom can’t differentiate between the two, but a pedophile is someone who is sexually attracted to human children, and an equuleophile is someone with the sexual attraction to pony children. The fillies and colts in MLP FiM don’t even resemble anything close to how a human child looks, and their body shapes are also very different in proportions with different anatomy. This makes them two completely different kinks on opposite sides of the spectrum, so there’s actually no correlation between the two. Being an equuleophile is nothing like being a pedophile who views darkweb child pornography or seeks to sexually abuse children, and I guarantee most equuleophiles don’t even have the attraction towards human children. I have even come across equuleophiles who also condemn pedophilia and the justification to legalise sex with human kids. Equuleophiles just sit behind the a computer screen jerking off to some art of a cartoon pastel coloured pony. Rule #5 on Derpibooru even states that sexual content which depicts underage human or anthro characters is prohibited from being posted here, due to ambiguous laws in several countries where it may be illegal. Derpibooru operates out of France and Germany, one of those countries outlaws real child porn and fictional child porn involving human characters. Unfortunately so many people will still be confused between the two kinks as there always have been, but there is a clear difference if you were to think about it.
@DarkyBoode32
Are you an “equuleophile” and did you come up with that word?
DarkyBoode32
Artist -

The Best There Ever Was
Disagree. People who like foalcon are actually equuleophiles not pedophiles. Some people in this fandom can’t differentiate between the two, but a pedophile is someone who is sexually attracted to human children, and an equuleophile is someone with the sexual attraction to pony children. The fillies and colts in MLP FiM don’t even resemble anything close to how a human child looks, and their body shapes are also very different in proportions with different anatomy. This makes them two completely different kinks on opposite sides of the spectrum, so there’s actually no correlation between the two. Being an equuleophile is nothing like being a pedophile who views darkweb child pornography or seeks to sexually abuse children, and I guarantee most equuleophiles don’t even have the attraction towards human children. I have even come across equuleophiles who also condemn pedophilia and the justification to legalise sex with human kids. Equuleophiles just sit behind the a computer screen jerking off to some art of a cartoon pastel coloured pony. Rule #5 on Derpibooru even states that sexual content which depicts underage human or anthro characters is prohibited from being posted here, due to ambiguous laws in several countries where it may be illegal. Derpibooru operates out of France and Germany, one of those countries outlaws real child porn and fictional child porn involving human characters. Unfortunately so many people will still be confused between the two kinks as there always have been, but there is a clear difference if you were to think about it.
Background Pony #CA39
ok really I dont believe it is the case…because their fictional characters that aren’t humans…say someone was jacking off to some picture of a cartoon child or human child…then yes…if tis something more of a fictional animal character than no…also you really need to be messed up in the head to be a pedo anyway…or your just a sick evil fuck who does that shit cause they gain pleasure from hurting others…so…no…just a rando jacking off to a filly character doesn’t make you a pedo…it just makes you a weird and gross person…
Background Pony #4854
@Neon97  
You said it! And even worse is all those mouthbreathing FoE fans and other such grimdark peddlers who pervert this fandom with their glorification of death and violence. Enjoying things we pure bronies don’t like should be a crime.
BlazyIsLazy
Wallet After Summer Sale -

@Background Pony #335C
that’s a stupid arguments
the point is that you’re promoting pedophila just by drawing child pornography.
 
so i made this comment because I thought I was make “self-awareness” but in reality i was looking for trouble. I inherited that opinion from one of my classmates at college that I’d desided to talk. they where talking about Shadman made a comic about Waluigi give his invention to Daisy for smash bro. They said “Shadman only drew that because he what everybody good side.” Honestly I don’t care about Shadman because he already ruined his life.
Background Pony #7A98
wait, technically all Ponies are just tiny horses? does that mean that the Tiny ponies are just Midget horse of the Ponies?
987Whitetails
Friendship, Art, and Magic (2020) -
Friendship, Art, and Magic (2019) - Celebrated Derpibooru's seventh year anniversary with friends
Artist -

i’m with @Blazy3 but i’m going to expand on what he/she said. technically Pedophilia is a mental illness, like depression. Human beings (especially males) tend to jerk off to a lot of things out of sexual pleasure and desire. but there’s obviously a LINE for that reasoning of Sexual Pleasure, and its not SOLELY determined by what you jerk off to.
 
when someone jerks off to young people cartoons in particular it is simply because of the shape of that character and the atmosphere that further help emphasize the shape because the shapes we are most sexually attracted to is the curvy and round objects that our brains familiarize with like the butt, thighs, shoulders and breasts. it’s NOT an illness, its biologically how our brain work and therefore being natural.
 
pedophilia is a different case. meaning the being is turned on specifically to younger bodies and not the natural case of being turned on to adult bodies or being more turned on to it than an adults. its apart of their rewired stimulation.
 
to say that if you jerk off to this object/being/cartoon then you have a mental illness is the equivalent to saying if you have said something sexually inappropriate to a woman (or if mistaken for it) then its “verbal Rape” which is a made up word by some feminists… https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=verbal%20rape
 
both people with pedophilia and people with NO pedophilia are BOTH attracted to the curvy and round shapes on a being. and thus even normal people can jerk off to young cartoons because of the shapes we familiarize with.
 
what defines the 2 brains being different is the PREFERENCE. people with pedophilia value child bodies specifically as well young people cartoon bodies MORE or EQUAL to how they value the adult body and its shapes. the average normal people value the adult (and young adult) body more than the child body. that simply means they value the shapes of a adult and if these shapes were on other beings, then the person would still find it more or less sexually attractive.
 
some humans fail to understand this and try to Broaden and modify the boundaries of what is “child pornography” JUST like how some people have Broadened and modified the boundaries of what is “Rape” and what is not.
 
if you are really sensitive and have broadened your boundaries of “child porn” and suddenly identify this guy jerking off to a cartoon of a young being and call him a pedophile, then you are confused and uneducated to what Naturally turns most human beings on and have failed to understand the human brain and its quirks.
 
i do not blame the person’s education specifically, since this stuff is deep and slightly complex but the fact that you get this lack of proper info more from your friends and media than from actual medical books, medical sites and medical staff as well as a psychologist and those who study the human body and brain is the reason why people get mistaken for pedophiles so easily and quickly false information get spread around.
 
so no, jerking off to Foalcon does NOT make you a pedophile. this is my Backed up Opinion with experiance. please dont take offence at it, im willing to have a conversation so long as it is polite.
Background Pony #AC04
Trained psychiatrists and psychologists, probably.
 
Fun fact: pedophilia is medically defined in most of the world as an attraction to very young children, not just anyone who happens to be under a given age of consent. Whether attraction to minors is pedophilia isn’t even a legitimate debate, because it just isn’t. It’s like people equating a bad mood from a rough day at work with clinical depression, or the “it’s just a theory” misinterpretation of what scientific theory is - the popular understanding of a term can very easily be an incorrect one.
Background Pony #C6A9
If someone make art about foalcon. That mean they are a pedophile. I think….
Background Pony #D73A
@Background Pony #335C  
sexual attraction to children = paedophilia  
sexual attraction to a consenting adult = not paedophilia  
enjoying a gory movie = not an act of murder
 
not sure why that’s so difficult to follow