Uploaded by Moonatik
1147x1324 PNG 184 kBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
The fuckin’ juxtaposition of the two images at the source, lmao.
Prompt: Sweetie Belle.
Prompt: Sweetie Belle.
Tags
+-SH suggestive197664 +-SH artist:moonatik1667 +-SH sweetie belle58761 +-SH pony1708169 +-SH g42133028 +-SH 30 minute art challenge8066 +-SH chair12822 +-SH change my mind126 +-SH comments locked down544 +-SH discussion in the comments843 +-SH explicit source4989 +-SH female1917075 +-SH filly105498 +-SH foal54063 +-SH implied foalcon1791 +-SH implied masturbation1134 +-SH implied pedophilia57 +-SH magic102333 +-SH meme96931 +-SH mouthpiece1365 +-SH mug6757 +-SH smug10025 +-SH solo1511002 +-SH steven crowder35 +-SH table14122 +-SH vulgar26295
Loading...
Loading...
If the ponies are anthropomorphised/have human traits (which they most certainly do/are), then by logic if someone is attracted to foals in MLP they can most certainly be considered a pedophile, as the characters in question share traits/characteristics with human children by design, far more so than actual equine
(not that that would make it any better really).
Thoughts?
Are you an “equuleophile” and did you come up with that word?
Never said it was a crime, just that its fucking gross and I agree it kinda makes you a pedo if you’re jacking off to characters designed to be/look like kids.
You said it! And even worse is all those mouthbreathing FoE fans and other such grimdark peddlers who pervert this fandom with their glorification of death and violence. Enjoying things we pure bronies don’t like should be a crime.
What?
so i made this comment because I thought I was make “self-awareness” but in reality i was looking for trouble. I inherited that opinion from one of my classmates at college that I’d desided to talk. they where talking about Shadman made a comic about Waluigi give his invention to Daisy for smash bro. They said “Shadman only drew that because he what everybody good side.” Honestly I don’t care about Shadman because he already ruined his life.
when someone jerks off to young people cartoons in particular it is simply because of the shape of that character and the atmosphere that further help emphasize the shape because the shapes we are most sexually attracted to is the curvy and round objects that our brains familiarize with like the butt, thighs, shoulders and breasts. it’s NOT an illness, its biologically how our brain work and therefore being natural.
pedophilia is a different case. meaning the being is turned on specifically to younger bodies and not the natural case of being turned on to adult bodies or being more turned on to it than an adults. its apart of their rewired stimulation.
to say that if you jerk off to this object/being/cartoon then you have a mental illness is the equivalent to saying if you have said something sexually inappropriate to a woman (or if mistaken for it) then its “verbal Rape” which is a made up word by some feminists… https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=verbal%20rape
both people with pedophilia and people with NO pedophilia are BOTH attracted to the curvy and round shapes on a being. and thus even normal people can jerk off to young cartoons because of the shapes we familiarize with.
what defines the 2 brains being different is the PREFERENCE. people with pedophilia value child bodies specifically as well young people cartoon bodies MORE or EQUAL to how they value the adult body and its shapes. the average normal people value the adult (and young adult) body more than the child body. that simply means they value the shapes of a adult and if these shapes were on other beings, then the person would still find it more or less sexually attractive.
some humans fail to understand this and try to Broaden and modify the boundaries of what is “child pornography” JUST like how some people have Broadened and modified the boundaries of what is “Rape” and what is not.
if you are really sensitive and have broadened your boundaries of “child porn” and suddenly identify this guy jerking off to a cartoon of a young being and call him a pedophile, then you are confused and uneducated to what Naturally turns most human beings on and have failed to understand the human brain and its quirks.
i do not blame the person’s education specifically, since this stuff is deep and slightly complex but the fact that you get this lack of proper info more from your friends and media than from actual medical books, medical sites and medical staff as well as a psychologist and those who study the human body and brain is the reason why people get mistaken for pedophiles so easily and quickly false information get spread around.
so no, jerking off to Foalcon does NOT make you a pedophile. this is my Backed up Opinion with experiance. please dont take offence at it, im willing to have a conversation so long as it is polite.
f
f
Fun fact: pedophilia is medically defined in most of the world as an attraction to very young children, not just anyone who happens to be under a given age of consent. Whether attraction to minors is pedophilia isn’t even a legitimate debate, because it just isn’t. It’s like people equating a bad mood from a rough day at work with clinical depression, or the “it’s just a theory” misinterpretation of what scientific theory is - the popular understanding of a term can very easily be an incorrect one.
So I am late? I guess no cake at all?
Fire’s been out for two months.
Edited
You are conflation pedophilia with sexual abuse of minors. stop that.
sexual attraction to children = paedophilia
sexual attraction to a consenting adult = not paedophilia
enjoying a gory movie = not an act of murder
not sure why that’s so difficult to follow