Uploaded by AH96 
800x450 00:04.98 GIF 9.68 MB
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
Forgot to include Rarity’s smile.
Source
not provided yet
Ah, you’re using the “drown out the faults in your own behavior by repeating your grudges whenever they’re pointed out” argument again. Let’s have another look at what was actually said.
@Background Pony #BF93
This is simply responding to an illogical complaint.
@Whonk
This is bringing out stock strawman arguments that were never mentioned before in the conversation in an effort to demonize “the enemy”. In other words, equating the enemy opinion to an unrelated horrible crime to rationalize hating it. While it’s noticeable that ths is what “the enemy” are being accused of, it’s also what you’re actually doing.
Yeah because the fat neckbeard thing is fat shaming at all. No siree.
Is there any kind of social justice that would be offended by this site that has done anything good at all in the real world?
Ah, you’re using the “unrelated evil opinion from an unrelated person in an unrelated conversation” argument. That would be a good example of an “attack”, since you asked. You treat the people you hate as if they were a monolithic embodiment of evil, and don’t address anything they’re actually saying or the points they’re making. When they try to have a conversation with you, you repeat the same stock condemnations ad nauseam in an attempt to drown out their actual points.
For example, if someone tried to explain what “fat-shaming” was, the shoutdowners might accuse them of comparing things they don’t like to some horrible and evil unrelated thing (even if they had actually said nothing of the sort beforehand), then falsely claim that they’re saying they’re exactly alike (as opposed to using an analogy), then proceed to ridicule and insult them out of the conversation. Then they would proceed to congratulate themselves on burning the social justice witch (assuming there was one present at all, and they didn’t just decide to talk to each other about how evil their enemies are) and decide their enemy was upset with them only because they couldn’t handle “the slightest disagreement from their evil oppressive opinions”, rather than for how they actually behaved.
What attacks are you referring to per say? What have bronies done compared to the worse anti brony slacktivists? Where is the brony equivalent of Pinkiepony?
Did you merely come here to do what you complain others are doing to you? Or is there some actual basis to your anger that isn’t pure hypocrisy?
If by “bronies” you mean “social justice devils who don’t deserve to speak”, then it probably has something to do with people who treat themselves like innocent little angels while making hate speeches and claiming that any words they say are evil and sexist and some other horrible verbal crime, then trying to pass it off as “just innocently stating a different opinionn” and proceeding to claim that anyone who calls out their attacks as what they are is an evil freedom-hating Nazi who “can’t stand the slightest hint of disagreement”.
That, or they divert the accusations completely with the usual stand by of “that’s a social justice verbal war crime” without even acknowledging that they’re doing it, or whether the people they’re shouting down aren’t. They’ve got their minds set on an extremely specific, self-serving worldview, and they simply dismiss things that don’t fit into their narrative of innocent victimhood.
>Asks when men has been shamed
>Derails conversation to unrelated rant when you get an answer.
Since Background Pony #8150 lost track of it
@Background Pony #BF93
Gee I wonder why bronies got sick of that shit? Whats next? Pretending the flood of mouthpieces never happened? Attempting another derail?
Did someone get triggered?
I know, that’s why they act like their targets are “whiny” oppressors out to destroy free speech while they call them monsters and twist all their words into some sort of evil attack. And whenever anyone calls them out on anything, they just go “that’s what our enemies do” while not even acknowledging their own actions.
In fact, they probably think I’m talking about their victims right now. Which wouldn’t be surprising, since they consider anyone with the wrong opinion a “warrior”, which seems to translate to “subhuman monster who can safely be denied inalienable human rights because they’re evil incarnate”.
The problem is that’s using logic against them.
They’re immune to reasoning.
I’ll remember that the next time I see someone complain about the evil hateful mindless social justice beasts treating their “disagreement” like a personal attack.
Not sure this was worth replying to a 2 month post over but:
I’m referring to the way Tumblrinas regarded bronies, and had no problem using that stereotype to insult them. I wonder how many people went on to complain about being fat shamed?
No. Which episode was that?
Sorry for the late reply.
That’s because according to SJW logic, disagreeing with a woman is harassment, and harassment is the same as rape, meaning you’re a rapist for not listening to the master race untermench!
Well if you insist
now lets talk about black people and immigrants
Remember the fat neckbeard thing?
Men can’t be shamed. We’re too superior to feel shame.
When have men been fat-shamed?
That’s an entirely different can of worms. No one said anything about fat shaming being exclusive to women. It’s bad either way.
Men have been fat shamed and no one cared. But when women are fat-shamed suddenly its a crime against humanity.