Uploaded by Background Pony #E311
250x250 PNG 60 kBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH safe2281727 +-SH artist:kwark85172 +-SH edit181997 +-SH twilight sparkle371695 +-SH pony1711742 +-SH unicorn587794 +-SH derpibooru8184 +-SH g42123702 +-SH alicorn drama1132 +-SH drama3361 +-SH female1912545 +-SH mare814434 +-SH meta18886 +-SH spoiler787 +-SH spoiler alert58 +-SH spoilered image joke717 +-SH unicorn twilight38018 +-SH wingless edit71
Loading...
Loading...
The vector used is from >>945128.
okay, it was uploaded around the same time that a whole bevy of anti-twilicorn kwark images were being uploaded. better?
Kwark didn’t upload any of that. Not a single image. So, for the sake of reality, I’m going to remove the Kwark tag from this. It’s not in his gallery, it’s not anywhere he actually posts images, so this cannot be called his.
Oh, really?
I didn’t know that.
Although I was more referring to the fact that you can’t set yourself as BP to edit tags, unless you’re the OP.
@SuperSupermario24
I think the real reason we can say it was quark is because it was uploaded around the same time that kwark was spam uploading a whole bevy of anti-twilicorn images, if I recall correctly
@SuperSupermario24
Nope. you can edit tags without being logged in. you’ll just have to do a captcha test to confirm you’re not a spambot if you try.
Or at least, I think that’s how it works.
The tag “artist:kwark85” was added by a Background Pony, and the only time you can be anon while editing tags is if you were the OP.
I thought Everyone liked wings. COME GIT YO WINGZ YA’LL!
I GOT WANGZ FOR DAYS!
OP is a repeat dramabait poster
For this particular image, I’d say the odds are strongly in favor of it.
Probably.
Yes and yes.
Welcome to, now.
So? Does that specifically mean that the image is automatically drama bait? If someone removed the wings, does that automatically mean that the person who did it wants to start shit?
Not just the fact that she has no wings, but the fact that the original version of this image had wings and OP took the time to specifically edit them out.
@Psyga315
>removal of wings
>removal of wings from an iconic alcornificated Twilight image
>removal of wings from an image that really has minimal artistic value anyway
>yeah, drama bait