@Ferrotter  
Ahh yeah.  
The other image, the plony getting his wings brushed, was actually a Finnair plane but I noticed it when it was too late… so I left it like so.

@GoldenPansy  
It’s more that something didn’t happen. This seems to be a recurring character ( >>953218 seems pretty clearly meant to be the same plane pony as this image) but there is no name for the character in the tags, and there was no type of plane in the tags.
 
But even though it’s probably the same plane pony, the example image in the uploader comments for >>953218 is a different aircraft (an MD-82 with the tail number OH-LPA) than for this image (the christened name under the flags, “Slagfinn Viking,” identifies this one as an MD-87 with tail number LN-ROZ). So I tagged them with the type of planes shown. But an MD-82 and an MD-87 look very similar (both are technically types of DC-9), so again, it’s probably meant to be exactly the same character, even though the example planes in the comments are different.
 
Hopefully OP or the artist or someone will identify the character name and airplane type, and change the tags.

@Ferrotter  
Uh something happened here?

This is cute.
 
(It’s not an error on the plane designations, if you notice they don’t match. LN-ROZ “Slagfinn Viking” is an MD-87 owned by SAS; OH-LPA is an MD-82 owned by Finnair. Despite a family resemblance because they’re both derived from the DC-9, they’re very different aircraft. MD-82s are 20% longer and also faster, intended for short hops between busy airports. While MD-87s are smaller planes with much more efficient engines and a longer range, intended to make routes with weak passenger traffic economically viable. Given that both examples are DC-9s, I expect the artist intends the plane pony to be the same one, when it gets a name and canonical type designation.)