Uploaded by Background Pony #D993
882x480 PNG 681 kBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a07a/0a07a8d636d6712c857b72dac4c4c012fb841add" alt="Use your hooves and trot in to experience the Fediverse with friendship and ponies."
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH safe2289024 +-SH idw22666 +-SH official comic8088 +-SH princess celestia116902 +-SH queen chrysalis44227 +-SH spike95697 +-SH twilight sparkle372607 +-SH bat pony82298 +-SH changeling70835 +-SH changeling queen25832 +-SH pony1718960 +-SH fiendship is magic #586 +-SH g42130044 +-SH my little pony: fiendship is magic474 +-SH spoiler:comic13668 +-SH badass3826 +-SH book46203 +-SH concave belly10904 +-SH female1920752 +-SH fight7838 +-SH fire16936 +-SH glare9224 +-SH injured4947 +-SH magic103402 +-SH manuscript2 +-SH open mouth259126 +-SH prime celestia64 +-SH raised leg13537 +-SH rearing8394 +-SH slender12109 +-SH spread wings106464 +-SH stylized506 +-SH thin17730 +-SH wide eyes20532
Source
not provided yet
Loading...
Loading...
Sethisto took the Jim quote out of context; see the whole conversation.
Celestia victorius?? God forbid, back to the cocoon with you!!!
Yes.
Canon
Then you have these two rather contradicting tweets.
Lyn/Rath vs. Lyn/Hector debates. Brr…
Mm, true. A number of game franchises come to mind. Ooh, and Star Trek. X3
@thps48: I’m sure that this sort of thing will keep going on as long as the world’s turning. MLP G4 or not.
@Pepsi_Al
@Pagan
@Keith Mowz
You know what I mean about the staff’s vagueness resulting in endless disagreement between fans concerning information presented between several mediums? XD
That’s my thoughts as well. I have also been avoiding the comics since the Siege arc.
My only opinion on them is that I am liking them less and less as more and more people try to use them to argue against headcanon stuff.
I don’t care what they did in the comics. I am only interested in the show. I don’t care if a given fan theory is ‘disproven’ by the comics.
How do you not know what canon means? Like @Pepsi_Al said it means it shares continuity.
@Pepsi_Al
I’m fully aware that IDW and Hasbro say they are canon but like I said that only goes so far and you can’t force people to accept everything I like most of the comics all but 3 in particular the rest I’m fine with but those other three and some general things with comics involving Chrysalis.
I don’t pay much attention to EQG or the chapter books so I have no opinion on them and I never read any of the comics involving Luna or NMM so I have no opinion on them either.
And “canon” is often used to describe anything that’s in continuity in regards to the main story. It’s pretty much why showrunners describe EQG as “canon in that it happened”. And given what I remember the showrunners saying about the chapter books, the same applies to them. If anything, the TCG, toy backstories. and the iOS game are so far the only “non-canon” MLP:FiM materials.
Page 11: Twilight narrating: “Princess Celestia arrived in time to save the citizens of the city and banish Chrysalis for hundreds of years…”. The image here is from the same panel.
Is it before or after those two pages?
@thps48
@Pepsi_Al
Thanks. I notice, though, that:
One of the flashbacks recounting Chrys’s suspected fake stories involved Flutterponies. In the climax, Celestia’s plasma beams were the apparent cause of holes on all Changelings, though as aforementioned, each of her stories were suspected to be false.
This was more than likely guaged by the responses I saw on DB, however, there may be other thoughts on the Chrys Friendship I’ve not yet found… If I have, I may have forgotten; you’ll notice I’m not super attentive. lel
It’s rather apparent the connection between the program, comics, books, EG, and other venues is vague enough to, eh, cause the fanbase to endlessly argue for about it for six years. There are fans who instantly dimisses anypony who brings up information not expressly discussed by the show. Why? I dunno. >w<
Amy Keating Rogers made a book, The Journal of the Two Sisters, and in an interview, she claims the alicorn homeland brought up in the book is applicable to Celestia’s and Luna’s past in the show. I wouldn’t exactly know how this could be at all relevant unless another alicorn(s) immigrates to or visits Equestria from their birthplace. This’d ultimately involve giving Celestia a far larger spotlight than she has had previously, which I’d probably call something me really, really wantee.
The Chrys Fiendship involved the Changelings going to war with the Flutterponies. The story of the creation of the Changelings the comic depicted was dismissed by a majority of the fanbase for being lame. However, I’d imagine because it was told via the comic, the program nor another outlet registered with FiM’s trademark will delve into the origins of the creation of the species. This is actually applicable to a few other ascepts introduced by the comics, books, and other mediums besides the show. To be honest, I don’t particularly feel the need to think about or discuss such things as Cadance’s childhood, Sombra’s source of dark powers, or the country of all alicorns, because I’m expecting, eh, I suppose more likely, hoping they’d be implemented in the show with… Eh, some alterations if necessary. ^3^
I’m really tired and about to go to bed commas were the last thing on my mind right now.
What Flutterpony arc? Whose idiot birth? And why do you feel the need to point out that you don’t remember a particular thing in a comic you just said you haven’t read yet (though I imagine you may have by now)?
@Pepsi_Al
@Pagan
While you make good points, you really could’ve split that into more than two giant run-on sentences.
Edited
Speaking of Journal of the Two Sisters, there is an inconsistency in it that does arise when Celestia comments about Flurry Heart. But like I said, it’s minor.
Taking another source made by different writers who usually don’t pay attention to the original source and using that as proof of something especially when it contradicts is really not something you should do if you can’t use evidence from the actual source being discussed then you probably shouldn’t discuss it or at least not act like you have the superior answer.