@paluzna
 
@Vest
 
The problem with Luna’s forearms is that they start to curve in where they should flare out slightly (just below her elbows). This characteristic of the muscles typically ignores the rotation of the forearm. Rather, it is mostly determined by the angle of the hand respective to the rest of the forearm.
 
The skin on your back does not crease until your upper arms are nearly touching your head. Also, at their current extent of flex, Luna’s elbows would not have a crease unless she was incredibly ripped, which she is not in this picture (thankfully). On that note, Luna’s arms are not (and should not ever be) far enough apart to cause a noticeable difference in their sizes as a result of perspective, so her right arm should not be smaller than her left.
 
Her shoulder blades are lop-sided and too far away from her spine for the position of her arms. The apparent angle of the light would have her shadow on the part of the railing on the other side of her body. Also not aligned are the position of the moon and the apparent reflection on the river.
 
 
And well… now you know why I don’t draw. Or critique. Anyway, this is a lovely picture and it’s well-colored.

@Vest  
sorry to disapoint man, but there arent many proper art critics in here.  
i mean, its a great pic and there not much i can say about it that isnt nitpicking. heres some stuff aniway:
 
her forearms look weird… how do you get that profile of them? i cant quite get it whit my arms.
 
i guess the lineart could be better implemented into your “realistic” coloring, it kinda clashes, but it isnt that much of bother aniway.
 
if you focus too much on her back, above her lingerine, it start too look like a belly lol.
 
the backgroung is great, but the sky is a bit too colorfull for my tastes, if it were darker the landscape would be more contrasting.
 
then again, the focus is on luna, not the background… although making the color-composition focus on the landscape would also put more focus on dat butt.

@Eve Ashgrove  
I find it unfortunate people talk more about the tags than the art.
 
I get excited because I see 20 comments on an image, so I look forward to getting a lot of feedback. Instead it’s just passive-aggressive bickering about the proper utilization of solo female.

@Eve Ashgrove  
It’s a farce.  
We just love to come back and watch the picture again.

I wonder why so many of my pieces turn into discussions about proper tagging…

@Blissey1  
questionable is for stuff you’d see in real life whithout thinking its realy sexual in nature, or something like that, i’d guess.

@PlotHole  
oh hey, when did we get such a nicely detailed tagging page?
 
*reads*
 

 
…this goes against everything I have ever known

@Background Pony #E5A7  
Nope, read the tag guidelines.

@Background Pony #DE36
 
solo female tag for questionable and explicit rate.
 
suggestive doesn’t need solo female tag.

@Dark Deed  
tips’ meme hat.

Love the elf ears as well.

Obey. MUST obey.

@Poptard  
Whatever you say, Francis.

You know what I don’t hate?  
I don’t hate Vests.

Striping her can make you feel good once. Being on a good terms with her can make you feel so much better.

“Yes, of course, my Lady”  
Hooks the bra

@Blissey1  
Perhaps she’s wondering what it feels like to have someone pull off her panties with their teeth?

@RapidMapper  
she wouldn’t need help getting it off, but she might still want help
 
not for her sake, you understand~

@Background Pony #D0F1  
Dressing. The bra’s already unhooked, so she wouldn’t need help getting it off.

Not sure if dressing or undressing

@Blissey1  
Yeah, tell that to anyone tagging ‘solo male’ images and you’ll get a verbal boot to your face by the people who filter that tag.  
It should always be applied both ways, no exceptions.

@Background Pony #DE36  
many people would argue that the solo variant tags are also “inconsequential”

Definately qualifies for solo female.  
Always makes me laugh when an image has a million tags but misses the important ‘solo’ variant that applies, yet has inconsequential tags anyway.

Snip snip