Humanized OCs have always been fine as long as there’re at least “a few” pony/anthro images of them already on the board. >300 is more than “a few”.

@Background Pony #E229  

 
you mean just like every single other humanized OC?

@Background Pony #E229
 
Except its a broken logic that makes little sense.
 
You’re legit trying to group this together with image uploads like >>913335, >>916228 (deleted), >>914546, etc under the grounds of the OC itself somehow not being MLP related (when there is in fact a wooping 328 other uploads of it picturing it as a MLP OC preceeding it).
 
This, coupled with the fact that there are virtually no other Humanized OC tagged uploads that are also tagged with Barely Pony Related (only 4 results, not including the two variants of this, out of 189 Humanized OC uploads total) makes the addition of that tag ridiculous, and you are at that point just grasping at straws trying to class it as such when there is tons of uploads that go way past the point of stretching it on this site - completely untouched.
 
Removing the tag. You need a better reason than this.

Adding a comment only because tagging this is getting contentious.
 
There’s a dearth of defining characteristics (MLP OC color scheme not used, no established outfit, hairstyle isn’t particularly unique) and nothing to otherwise suggest this is in any way related to MLP. You would have to have contextual knowledge of the OC to see the relation.
 
If this is an established MLP fandom OC then fine (though I’ve never heard of her before now), but I do think “Barely Pony Related” is at least justified in this context. We’ve had some mainly-MLP artists have their images removed for not having pony content in them in the past.

UNF to the max!

I don’t care if she’s an OC. She’s HOT!

If we are gonna pull this discussion, then how exactly were humanized canon ponies related to MLP again?
 
Both humanizations are based on MLP related characters, who already have a bunch of MLP related content attached to them.
 
So what exactly makes humanized (as in humanized into humans) OC’s different from Equestria Girl-ified OC’s (or just EG only OC’s) and humanized canon ponies?
 
By logic, as a pony imageboard Derpibooru should technically not allow any kind of humans or characters who are completely detached from MLP, meaning that there should technically be an Equestria Girls imageboard.

@low risk loris  

 
wow, you’re right! just look at how pink that skin tone is!

@The Smiling Pony
 
if you can’t get enough animu there is plenty of it everywhere else

@low risk loris  
That’s the most idiotic thing I’ve read all day. And I’ve been reading all the comments on the SCOTUS ruling, too.

@Blissey1
 
flufflepuff has pastel colored skin, so she actually could be a background character in EQG
 
this is just a random animu

@low risk loris  
the same thing that, say, humanized Flufflepuff images have to do with mlp.

@low risk loris  
idk, but it needed better tags anyway.

what does this have to do with mlp

it’s tagged suggestive (you can see a little big of cleavage and a pair of large breasts)