Uploaded by Background Pony #AEC5
1166x968 PNG 210 kBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
Requested by foxkai on FA.
Tags
+-SH safe2281356 +-SH artist:silverscarf35 +-SH button mash4968 +-SH oc1010033 +-SH oc:cream heart3106 +-SH earth pony551210 +-SH anthro378214 +-SH plantigrade anthro56202 +-SH g42123501 +-SH barefoot36707 +-SH clothes679326 +-SH feet57692 +-SH female1912187 +-SH foot fetish12823 +-SH giant anthro454 +-SH giant pony6151 +-SH macro15648 +-SH macro/micro1756 +-SH male589929 +-SH micro12729 +-SH mother and child7259 +-SH mother and son4612 +-SH pants25051 +-SH size difference23976
Loading...
Loading...
It is weird, isn’t it?
And was a minor himself when he drew this.
Momma pony would never crush her son! :<
I’d totally want it though
Really? I drew this one month ago (>>918292), I tagged it both as foot fetish and safe and nobody complained. Yes, the fact that nobody complained doesn’t mean I must be right; but to be honest, I don’t understand why foot fetish should imply the suggestive tag — mainly because pretty much everything can be considered as foot fetish: just put a foot in a picture, and if some people are turned on by it then they can consider it a foot fetish pic. You’d just end up tagging everything as such (and therefore as suggestive), and non-foot fetishists who spoilered the suggestive tag would never be able to see hundreds of pictures that they might have liked otherwise (because seriously, this is nothing more than a cute pic for someone who knows nothing of fetishes). And this wouldn’t be a good thing, would it?
I think I know what I’m talking about: I’ve drawn some unsafe pictures in the past, pictures that truly deserved their grimdark, grotesque and explicit tags. I still remember about that time in which I drew a picture of a giant OC crushing a tiny pony under her plot, and let’s just say I wasn’t even satisfied until I added some ketchup to my drawing: people were disgusted by that “”“thing”””, which led to the creation of the crush fetish tag, that’s been used under each one of my pics ever since and that I never forget to add whenever I draw something similar again. And I think that people did the right thing in creating it, because that picture was objectively horrible: only people who share my fetishes could appreciate it, and tagging it like that makes it easier for everyone else to spoiler it and all of its future brothers. But what about this one? Isn’t this a completely different situation? Isn’t this a tame picture for the majority of our community? I’m not even saying that we should remove the foot fetish tag: that’s useful if you’re into feet and are looking for images of this kind after all. I’m just saying that it shouldn’t ALWAYS imply the suggestive tag, in my opinion. For any body part or object or situation you can think of, there exists at least one person on Earth who has that as their fetish: yet this is not enough of a reason to tag everything on derpiboru as NSFW, right?
Fetishes are automatically tagged as suggestive material. Even something that’s technically SFW like feet needs to be tagged correctly.
Fetish material, perhaps?
Nice Pic <3