Uploaded by cheezedoodle
500x275 00:10.56 GIF 9.67 MBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
I like to think it’s a little something Shining Armor taught her.
Tags
+-SH safe2274483 +-SH screencap302788 +-SH double diamond1970 +-SH night glider1617 +-SH party favor1753 +-SH starlight glimmer62735 +-SH sugar belle3916 +-SH twilight sparkle372164 +-SH alicorn337549 +-SH earth pony548831 +-SH pony1707747 +-SH unicorn585022 +-SH g42132739 +-SH my little pony: friendship is magic268057 +-SH the cutie map4418 +-SH adventure in the comments1353 +-SH animated132109 +-SH attempted murder84 +-SH badass3835 +-SH barrier247 +-SH beam345 +-SH equal four195 +-SH eyes closed148566 +-SH female1916635 +-SH floppy ears78071 +-SH force field917 +-SH frown38649 +-SH gif62273 +-SH glare9200 +-SH gritted teeth20787 +-SH magic102311 +-SH magic blast1343 +-SH male588664 +-SH mare810995 +-SH protecting801 +-SH s5 starlight2939 +-SH spread wings106536 +-SH stallion212969 +-SH twilight sparkle (alicorn)155225
Source
not provided yet
Loading...
Loading...
“I thought she was with you”
it’s good exercise!
Meh. You’ll cause yourself a lot of stress being argumentative.
sorry for being so obstinant about it. I really just enjoy arguing about the virtues of the show because it’s awesome. people can call it a kid’s show, long as they’re not looking for my approval.
Fair enough. I still don’t think us calling it something different would make it change much. They may add more stuff in a shadowed or veiled kind of way, but arguably they do that already.
But I agree with the rest in letter and spirit.
I call something a kid’s show if it’s made for kids, by kids, and/or about kids. it’s like how AARP is a retirement magazine, so you won’t find tips on dealing with that cute boy in gym class in it. too many people think that shows for general audiences are kid’s shows, but there is a very clear genre in my opinion, of shows and commercials specifically catering to a child audience.
if enough people start calling it one thing or another, then the show creators will change it. people wanted more stallions in mlp, people got more stallions in mlp. I can only choose my own behavior, what I personally will call something, but that doesn’t mean I’m implying that I alone decide the fate of it. we all do, and each of our voices counts towards it. considering carefully what I say does not mean I’m arrogant or deluded for daring to think that anything I say matters.
Whether you call it a kid’s show or not is not going to make it so suddenly it will have mature episodes. Hate to disappoint, but that will never happen. The closest we’ll get is what we’ve already seen: veiled stuff, at best. If you think it will suddenly ever stop being Y or Y7, then you’ve spent too long on the internet.
Also, if you think calling it a kids’ show will make them remove all adult characters and make everyone live with their parents and their plots about school, then you’ve also spent too much time on the internet
that’s what Equestria Girls was for.Also, what the freak? Trying to defend a battered woman by calling her that… Is somehow equivalent to calling a family-friendly show… A kids’ show?
You know what? I’ll give you this much; calling it a “family friendly” show is probably more accurate. But it’s kind of pointless since anyone here should already know it’s not Peppa the Pig or Dora the Explorer, and calling it a different name on a pony image booru is not going to make the show creators suddenly decide to throw all the characters back into magic kindegarden or turn it into a who-slept-with-who sitcom with “adult” scenes.
so let me get this straight… it’s not a “kid’s show” and if we can get it recognized as not a kid’s show, we’ll get our pony yiff scene. so therefore, we should go in assuming we lost, always refer to it as a kid’s show, and help the censors prevent it from being recognized as anything else?
I mean, if you want them to remove all adult characters, make everyone live with their parents, and make all plots about life in elementary school, then yes you can call it a kid’s show, but otherwise I’m baffled at your motivation for defending it as such.
when I want to predict that pony won’t be anatomically correct on TV, I say “they’ll never get it past the censors.” I don’t start calling it a kid’s show. that’s like trying to defend a battered woman by calling her a trashy whore.
considering tirek’s blast actually did kill a giant beautiful *sob* tree, I don’t know that it’s fair to compare with starlight here. if they wanted it to look like a killing blow, they’d have had twi teleport them out and starlight’s blast melt a hole in the side of the mountain, or something. it did look pretty wicked awesome though.
“It’s a kids show” is true to the extent that they’ll never add content to it that you cannot add to a show for kids. It doesn’t mean they can’t add adult topics; it’s just if they do, they’ll have some level of euphemism of veiling.
ie, we won’t get a pony snax scene. That doesn’t necessarily prove it’s a kids show, but calling it a kids’ show, in that regard, is an effective way to make predictions, thus, like any theory in physics, it’s “true enough” (since being able to make predictions with something is more or less the criteria for it being “true”).
Really it’s just kind of pointless pedantry… Though I agree with your sentiment that it’s incredibly annoying when people brush it off with “it’s a kids show” or use it to state some stupid hypothesis like there can never be any risk in it, or ponies produce by budding or something stupid like that. They seem to forget, that despite its nature, the ponies lives have been endangered many times (example: the landslide in S1E2), Sombra died, and there have been plenty of attempted murders (ie, Tirek blasting the fireball at Twi that destroyed the single best place in fiction to ever exist - the Golden Oaks), so Starlight firing a death blast at those ponies is perfectly within the show’s rating. You can argue other reasons that that might not have been a killing blow, but you can’t make the rating argument.
in english, association has many different meanings. it can convey ownership, as in a kid owns the show, or it can convey focus, as in kids are the ones who star in the show, or it can convey dependency, that it’s a show designed for an audience of kids. that’s what it means to call something a kid’s show. it doesn’t mean an adult’s show that doesn’t have death in it, nor does it mean a show for all audiences that sugarcoats troubling topics. so when you call mlp a “kid’s show” I can’t say you’re correct. even if what you say is true, it only states that kid’s shows can have no permadeath, but the converse to that is not necessarily true, so mlp having no permadeath doesn’t imply anything about whether it’s a kid’s show or not.
“you can’t do that on television” was a kid’s show. “call of the cutie” was a kid’s episode. mlp:fim in general is just… not especially forbidden to children, even those with anally retentive parents.
And it being a kid’s show just means none of the characters will ever permadeath (which is true of many shows anyways) and if there’s references to adult topics they’ll be veiled.
I know I just love being piccayunish about people saying it’s a kid’s show
really though, they go through a surprising amount of effort to avoid committing to being just a kid’s show. I like to recognize it.
Point taken. Nevertheless, my point about friendship still stands :U
wow, you’re right. that is disproportionate retribution!
@Dirty Bit
really, TV-Y more implies that it’s a “wimp’s show” than a “kid’s show”.
See previous comments…
How is she worse?
All she did was trip a kid. Who did not even get hurt.
None of the potential damage, that could have happened would not have been done by Starlight.
At worst she would have been an accessory.
Remember that this is a kid’s show.
Also, what separates Starlight from Tirek was that she was willing to accept and learn more about friendship.
Won’t deny that she was worse than Tirek with her screwing with time, but them’s the breaks.
I’m not saying she needs to be executed for what she did but for fucks sake, where’s capital punishment when something critically horrible has happened!?
Edited
right, even though they did it, you un-did them doing it. time cops have it rough.
Then if you try to arrest or otherwise punish them, you’ll be punishing them for something they haven’t done :p
I do think starlight wasn’t intentionally trying to destroy everything. I just find it hilarious that when you use time travel to defeat a villain, they’ve actually committed no crime because you retroactively stopped all their crimes from ever happening.
@redweasel
Jarkes’ is more compelling, but they’re both worthy counterarguments.
no, I mean even if she had intended to destroy the space-time continuum, she didn’t. she didn’t create the wasteland. she never caused the crystal war. she never changed history so that the changeling queen would win. she never changed history at all, not even once.
I really don’t get why people act like she was INTENTIONALLY trying to destroy the space-time continuum. Her reaction to the wasteland quite clearly indicated that she WASN’T. She didn’t expect Twilight and her friends to be so damn important to Equestria.
she didn’t screw the timeline though. ;)
it never happened.