EyeGuy
"[@Beau Skunky":](/414456#comment_1775932
[bq="Beau) Skunky"]
>" [@Psychopomf":](#comment_1775066
)
>
>
> I miss 2D animation in general, but problem is 3D is cheaper[/bq]
Not true. Every single film"[on this list":](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_expensive_animated_films) is CG. And a lot of older 2D-animated films are surprisingly cheap when adjusted for inflation. (For instance, The Secret of NIMH is only about $18 million.)
"
[@Beau Skunky":](/414456#comment_1775932
[bq="Beau) Skunky"]
>" [@Psychopomf":](#comment_1775066
)
> I also hear while "Princess and the Frog" was quite successful, (and it was a good movie, I felt) it wasn't successful enough to keep interest in 2D traditional animation going. :(
[/bq]
>
I think part of the reason TPatF wasn't a huge hit (along with competition from James Cameron's Avatar) was because it was marketed as a typical princess film, unlike Tangled and Frozen, which were marketed as comedies. (I was 14 when TPatF was released, and I avoided it because I thought it looked lame and girly thanks to the Disney Princess franchise being aimed at girls for the past decade.)
(I knowthisyour comment is four years old, but I still wanted to make this point.)
Dreading Season 9
[bq="Beau
>
>
>
> I miss 2D animation in general, but problem is 3D is cheaper
Not true. Every single film
"
[@Beau Skunky
[bq="Beau
>
> I also hear while "Princess and the Frog" was quite successful, (and it was a good movie, I felt) it wasn't successful enough to keep interest in 2D traditional animation going. :(
[/bq]
>
I think part of the reason TPatF wasn't a huge hit (along with competition from James Cameron's Avatar) was because it was marketed as a typical princess film, unlike Tangled and Frozen, which were marketed as comedies. (I was 14 when TPatF was released, and I avoided it because I thought it looked lame and girly thanks to the Disney Princess franchise being aimed at girls for the past decade.)
(I know