Uploaded by dt 
635x567 PNG 25 kB
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH suggestive196313 +-SH artist:derekireba175 +-SH rarity226464 +-SH spike95606 +-SH twilight sparkle372190 +-SH dragon92847 +-SH pony1714759 +-SH unicorn589511 +-SH g42126739 +-SH caught4654 +-SH eyes on the prize7107 +-SH face down ass up12105 +-SH female1915916 +-SH foalcon22458 +-SH grayscale52752 +-SH japanese10338 +-SH looking at butt1439 +-SH male591357 +-SH mare816607 +-SH monochrome182016 +-SH observer344 +-SH pixiv11965 +-SH reacting to nudity1209 +-SH ship:sparity8636 +-SH shipping268865 +-SH straight189672 +-SH tail pull2877 +-SH voyeur609 +-SH voyeurism2939
Loading...
Loading...
your current filter.
your current filter.
your current filter.
your current filter.
your current filter.
your current filter.Edited
No problem, I am just confused what litmus test this failed to get the tag is all.
It may just be questionable; you’re right. However, I’d leave it at explicit for the time being until another mod can chime in on it.
Unless Spike’s dick is about two foots long, the haunches of rarity are way too high for any sexual intercourse to be occurring and for all we know they have the same anatomy of the ponies of the show.
Nothing in the picture is explicit unto itself, which makes me wonder why. Your answer kinds of just makes me think more that it should be tag differently now.
Read the tag guidelines.
Explicit: Any sort of sex (be it vaginal, anal, oral, manual, whatever), EVEN if the genitals themselves are not directly visible; if your image has characters having sex in it is explicit