@Da5ch
why are warhammer fans like this

I like this. It’s funny

@InvisibleInkDoodles  
Funny thing is that, well, I do. What did they say about it?

@Background Pony #D19A  
Well, I don’t have Aspergers but If you’re going to try and use someones mental disability as a derogatory term then you really need to be reminded where you are right now…

@Background Pony #D19A  
Nope. This is lost on me.

@Da5ch  
I have a team of experts working around the clock to figure out what you just said.

YonaBar? I smell SJWs…  

 
Equestria mares are still the standard of beauty and womanhood in Equestria. Yona should have stayed a pony, she was cute. That is how it would have been in season 2, before the heretics took over.
 
Racially-pure Rarara speaks the truth.

@MaresFillies  
Respect!

@LadyTheRainicorn  
He wants all of that yak butt. ;^)

@MaresFillies  
I can’t blame him

Lmao, Yona is a yak of course her built would be bigger that’s biology as Twi would say or maybe Lyra… XD
 
Sandbar just likes the thicc chicks. Pony ass isn’t enough for him.

People sure do love captioning this screen cap for some reason.

trying way too hard

Goddamit why is this funny?

@Dave33333
 
If it’s harassment over a shipping then I don’t see how that’s an SJW issue. Firstly if he thinks it’s unfair he can always open up a direct message with the person or with another mod and try and figure it out rather than on the image but secondly because I didn’t see the argument I have no context. I can only assume it’s related to the sexuality element of it - but if he questioned the legitimacy of it rather than mentioning sexuality specifically then that’s not really related to SJWs and if it was about the sexuality that he mentioned then like Rainev1 said it depends how it was said and equally believing in same-sex marriage or pairings doesn’t make you an SJW or even ‘on the left’, I think that notion is unfair to those on the right. I mean I assume he didn’t mention his religion as that’d been strange on a shipping post, but without a link to the conversation, I don’t know.
 
I’m not disagreeing that mods on the site aren’t all good. There are good ones but there are also ones with an attitude problem, they work for free so like any volunteer job (without mentioning any names) there are some who seemingly escalate things rather than deescalate BUT returning to my original point I don’t see how this is an SJW issue. So far I’ve seen no clear points of SJW elements at all, in cases like that below on this specific image it seems people often use the buzzwords like SJW to not actually address the actual reasons people downvote, dislike or constructively criticise.

@RaineV1  
I wish I had the comments, but he’s not the kind of guy to discriminate. He just questioned the legitimacy and a mod started rambling on how the producers were in on it and what not. When he questioned it some more, he was threatened with a ban.

@Dave33333  
I would say that depends on how he questioned it. Don’t know if it’s the situation with your friend, but I constantly hear people complain that they were singled out for just disagreeing with someone or expressing their opinion, only to see that they were being complete assholes about it, and doing it in the worst way possible.
 
So, was it actually bringing up why they wouldn’t work out or was it just something like, “Ew, gays.”

@InvisibleInkDoodles  
It is however, a problem on the sight thought.
 
I have a religious friend who’s autistic who was harassed by a mod because he questioned the RariJack shipping. I’m not extremely religious but if these are the people you put on staff and look down on people’s beliefs in such a way, it’s just plain wrong.
 
Nothing against you man, just adding on what the other guy said. Sick of politically powertripped moderators.

[deleted]

@Background Pony #7C77  
or the joke just doesn’t work as the premise is broken.. and most people have higher standards :P but let’s just dismiss that because it’s easier, right? Throwing buzzwords around sure does guarantee that you don’t have to think about anything in much depth, it’s fun :)

Sorry bro this is a SJW board

@SPNKRGrenth  
Though you aren’t constantly coming back here to alter the tags :P Like I said though, I was mainly teasing, at the end of the day it doesn’t matter who made the bad joke XD You can both include it on your resume if you want, I don’t mind.
 
Contradictive humour (which this image isn’t) is a type of humour that does fall into what I said, it has a set-up and punchline and the joke comes from a subversion of the joke format itself. Because we as a species understand the set-up and punchline so well, it’s so programmed into us that contradictive humour can take that premise and then play with it by subverting expectations. Pointing this out actually unintentionally helps my point XD Thanks for that.  
So A. it doesn’t contradict what I said and B. It doesn’t apply here since this image ain’t it chief and C. I never said a joke is a single specific way of operation… Like at all. I said a joke has a set-up and punchline so if a joke is played straight like it is here but the premise doesn’t work then the punchline is secondary to the premise which makes it a bad joke.. since it’s just words at that point XD There’s no type of humour where the premise doesn’t work but the joke does. Even contradictive humour relies on the premise of the format working so it can then be subverted.

Well what if I’M the uploader! I’m defending the image as well, so clearly I must have a personal stake in this. It couldn’t possibly just be because of the easy entertainment value this is making right now. Loving the insistence that a joke is a single specific way of operation too, just ignoring contradictive humor altogether really, where the point is it doesn’t make sense.