Uploaded by SlayerBVC
2000x2500 PNG 607 kBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH suggestive198244 +-SH artist:salemcat249 +-SH edit181555 +-SH edited edit2982 +-SH editor:slayerbvc1899 +-SH vector edit4777 +-SH fluttershy270481 +-SH sunset shimmer83180 +-SH equestria girls269431 +-SH g42138895 +-SH barefoot36800 +-SH bra23346 +-SH breasts419176 +-SH clothes685600 +-SH clothes swap2578 +-SH cutie mark underwear1012 +-SH feet57977 +-SH female1924440 +-SH high res413824 +-SH panties67762 +-SH pink underwear4774 +-SH simple background643399 +-SH skirt60722 +-SH tank top11621 +-SH transparent background302432 +-SH underwear83908 +-SH underwear edit1729 +-SH vector93134
Source
not provided yet
Loading...
Loading...
But when seen much more from the side, then I would agree adding the tag.
Oh well, I’ll just leave it this time.
Even if it’s a thong, it’s only an implied thong. I don’t know if it should be tagged if the part that makes it a thong isn’t even visible.
I feel like there’s a point they reach where they are so thin at the point they go out of view that expanding back out to be a full back is physically impossible, these ones kind of give that impression. Mostly wondering whether I should stick “thong” in the tags really.
A lot of artists draw thin straps on panties, making it look like thongs. It’s hard to know for sure here, but it is a possibility.