Uploaded by SlayerBVC
2000x2500 PNG 607 kBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH suggestive195915 +-SH artist:salemcat249 +-SH edit181989 +-SH edited edit2984 +-SH editor:slayerbvc1899 +-SH vector edit4786 +-SH fluttershy268846 +-SH sunset shimmer82632 +-SH equestria girls268153 +-SH g42123166 +-SH barefoot36701 +-SH bra22946 +-SH breasts410221 +-SH clothes679183 +-SH clothes swap2577 +-SH cutie mark underwear1010 +-SH feet57686 +-SH female1911805 +-SH high res411743 +-SH panties66456 +-SH pink underwear4733 +-SH simple background645204 +-SH skirt59702 +-SH tank top11541 +-SH transparent background303642 +-SH underwear82333 +-SH underwear edit1729 +-SH vector93310
Source
not provided yet
Loading...
Loading...
But when seen much more from the side, then I would agree adding the tag.
Oh well, I’ll just leave it this time.
Even if it’s a thong, it’s only an implied thong. I don’t know if it should be tagged if the part that makes it a thong isn’t even visible.
I feel like there’s a point they reach where they are so thin at the point they go out of view that expanding back out to be a full back is physically impossible, these ones kind of give that impression. Mostly wondering whether I should stick “thong” in the tags really.
A lot of artists draw thin straps on panties, making it look like thongs. It’s hard to know for sure here, but it is a possibility.