Scary woodpecker

I remember this one. It’s when I learn that wet concrete burns flesh.

Roosie!

@Ardashir  
It’d probably be worse if he looked more like a real bird, so at least he’s a li’l cartoony.
 
I still fear watching it, but apparently my nieces & nephews liked it, so it at least appelled to it’s target audience.

@northern haste  
Man, that’s nightmare fuel right there!

Heidi Hay and Tornado Bolt are watching the Woody Woodpecker 2018!

Don’t think I forgot about you two. You’re my favorite.

@Ardashir  
And the “comedy” horrifying.

I just found this movie on DVD at a local store. The CGI, well, didn’t look very good.

@Prof.NightJack  
The Lobster is still at large

@Depressed Knoll  
Ya, I liked that ending too. XD

@Prof.NightJack  
I’m sure there may be an edit of that, and it likely isn’t that hard to skip. Plus, The Lobster ending did get a laugh out of me.

@Depressed Knoll  
Well I didn’t mean it was bad, just that the way all the Schumacher bits went made it fell like it dragged a little.  
I did like it, just would of liked it to have a little less of that.

@Prof.NightJack  
Yep, and enjoyed that review.

@Depressed Knoll  
You found the Batman Forever one fine?

@Prof.NightJack  
I disagree to a degree, but to each their own.

@Depressed Knoll  
Well more then half the time, yes, but the more parody based sketch heavy ones(not the ones where they use no clips) can drag at times.  
The Batman Forever felt longer then it was, all the stuff of them interacting with Joel Schumacher(actully Jim Jarosz) started to come of kind of stupid, and not in a good way.

@Prof.NightJack  
In other words, his style changed overtime so it matured and wouldn’t grow stale, correct?

@Beau Skunky  
He’s positive on some reviews, but it’s so different for the other reviews when he does that(where he talk of good and bad now, unless it’s really bad all around), like it’s a whole other show.  
Like he did one on Freakazoind that is like the Animaniacs one where he talks with people that woprked on it, Paul Rugg and Tom Ruegger for this one.  
And lately a number of his reviews when it’s something he sees as bad are tuning more into a parody of one aspect of it around the review parts  
But admittedly the better one are when he can compare them to an older version, it’s not like the “Old VS New” he did in the past but he they work well, like his The Jungle Book and Maleficent reviews.  
The Jungle Book one he pointed to more then just the Disney one(for one the Chuck Jones one “Mowgli’s Brothers”) and the book, showing how differently they worked and where eatch did somthing better or worse in there version.  
And his Maleficent one he pointed to what made people like her so much in Sleeping Beauty(and I think a few other things, but can’t remember clearly) and how the live action movie screwed up.

@Depressed Knoll  
Either one depending on your opinions on that kinda thing.

@Beau Skunky  
In a good or bad way?

@Depressed Knoll  
Yeah, Youtube, and such have gotten more strict on that.

@Beau Skunky  
Honestly, I see it as the opposite, with most of his old-days joy coming from memes rather than the movies themselves, with his newer reviews focusing on the positives and negatives of the movie with a few sketches (or mostly sketches, if they can’t get good footage or fear copyright claims).

@Depressed Knoll  
Not always, he used to do positive-yet-still humorous reviews too, and different things like his “Top 10” lists. It gets a li’l annoying when he exaggerates negatives for lulz sometimes.
 
If I wanted to see that, I’d just come here to Derpibooru. :P  
Nyuk! Nyuk!

@Depressed Knoll  
I really don’t care he was still just showing as bits of plastic