Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Ministry of Image - Fanfiction Printing

Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!

Description

Original Image 
Someone I showed this image to took quite a liking to it, enough that he thought monochrome didn’t do it justice and had to colour it.
 
Also really hopes to see more DT and SS from you in the future Shax. As we all do, I’m sure.

useless source url4494 suggestive196836 artist:shaxbert133 edit182764 diamond tiara12262 silver spoon7848 anthro380094 g42130866 adorabullies126 adorasexy12981 bedroom eyes85354 blushing295458 braid11540 breasts412364 christmas23144 clothes683045 colored27585 crossed legs5304 cute281594 diamondbetes614 drink10590 eye contact7874 eyelashes31772 female1921892 get along shirt36 glasses97370 hearth's warming1417 holding hands4249 holly2446 legs12673 lesbian124138 lidded eyes53852 lip bite16160 looking at each other39332 mistletoe2392 mug6870 off shoulder1794 pinky out11 sexy47498 shared clothing957 ship:silvertiara543 shipping269730 silverbetes376 sweater21109 thighs30611

Comments

Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ ~sub~

Detailed syntax guide

Background Pony #C4DB
beautiful wearing one sweater, holding hands, hot chocolate…mistletoe…too adorable…[nosebleed]…i’m so sorry y////y[cover eyes while blushing] you two are cute together like…angels…kiss please…you are lovely couple :)~Count ziltromon
Background Pony #1B91
@Brownee  
Maybe the same site but maybe on a different domain, maybe not an existent one by the time I come around to read it. Or maybe I’ll see it in some archive excavated from ancient ruins long after we nuked Earth with its Internet and will have no way of checking it was the same site. Or maybe I just don’t want to leave the hidden service. In general, possible drawbacks are minor, but plenty, and pretty annoying. Internal links are best left internal.  
Of course you can do internal link with custom text too, but “original image” is exactly the opposite of what we call descriptive imo. It only tells about relation between the two posts, not about what the target of the link is. But when the link is there to literally just identify some resource, its (author, title)-tuple, URL, or other kind of recognizable identifier is the most descriptive text you can come up with anyway. Even it being linked is secondary then. Just like the source_url field which rightly is displayed verbatim rather than just there being the word “source” linked.  
My preference would be something like “Color edit of >>1325812.”  
I didn’t really expect anyone to reply to that half-hearted comment, though ;)
Background Pony #1B91
Please use >> to refer to other posts in description rather than URLs. ktnx.
Very nice! I was tempted to put some color on this, myself, but the season was already over by the time I drew it…
 
Ohh, I ain’t done with these two yet :D.