Uploaded by Psyga315
640x360 PNG 92 kBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH safe2264840 +-SH edit180483 +-SH edited screencap95443 +-SH screencap302483 +-SH fluttershy268879 +-SH pony1697027 +-SH cinemare sins251 +-SH bats!1926 +-SH g42124535 +-SH my little pony: friendship is magic267416 +-SH fangs43794 +-SH female1906078 +-SH open mouth256478 +-SH solo1503519
Source
not provided yet
Loading...
Loading...
its more like they hid it or forgot it
In “Do Princesses Dream of Magic Sheep?”, it was a dream. Fluttershy didn’t have her fang outside the dream, or during the dream when she wasn’t Flutterbat. – There’s no reference to the leftover fang at the end of this episode.
In “Scare Master”, she clearly shows that she got fake fangs, proving that she don’t have real fangs.
The leftover fang in this episode’s ending is never addressed again.
Yes, Flutterbat was refernced via drams and fake teeth, but Fluttershy having real fangs after being cured was never adressed again.
Well, I don’t care about the sin counter.
It’s no proper analysing/criticising; but it is in a jokingly matter.
pretty much made me realise what the videos were.
also the joke was pretty much to used as a sin instead of adding a joke to the sin
Edited
It’s more criticising in this case (that you shouldn’t include something that isn’t addressed in the future).
But there’s been other analyses.
And they do sprinkle in stupid jokes to that isn’t part of the analyse/criticism.
@northern haste
I can agree that some Xbox One jokes are stupid, or can be hypocrisy. But should one bad joke stop you from watching?
I stopped watching cinema sins after the Xbox One joke in the Pacific video
How is just saying something analysing?
oh
They are analysing; this image above proves that.
Fluttershy’s fang is never addressed again; something that shouldn’t have been included in the episode.
Edited
They’re not even doing that! It’s CinemaSins! It’s all a joke!
Badly done! To ride off the coattails of!
They’re reviewing and analysing the content; like how the fangs never again shows up (minus dreams and take teeth).
This is why you can’t have so different ideas and make radical decisions as a writer of one episode, in a team of people writing for different episodes.
Oh for Gods sakes, it’s CinemaSins!
useless content IMO
Dreams and fake teeth are not the same as real-life fangs.
Although IIRC the scenes in those eps could do just as well without this ending-reveal.
(But then, those scenes do kinda address the fangs again, so I see your point.)
Edited
That was a general mistake. I didn’t even mean to make anything else bold.
I think he was referring to the fangs in general.
By the way, you made only one of the parentheses bold. *ding*Edited because: TheOtherPinkiePie fixed the mistake.
Edited