Uploaded by Background Pony #84B4
 1400x900 PNG 1.03 MB
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Techy Cutie Pony Collection!

Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!

Description

No description provided.

suggestive195446 artist:aa251 oc1007089 oc only737335 oc:dulce deleche38 oc:sunny nebels32 human268738 against glass1917 barely pony related7503 big breasts133034 breasts409056 clothes677347 drool36742 female1907571 flower42815 flower in hair13878 glass7353 gloves32416 humanized123738 humanized oc3230 sweater20862 sweater dress183 sweater puppies222

Comments

Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ ~sub~

Detailed syntax guide

Aasha
Wallet After Summer Sale -
Artist -

@Background Pony #E805  
Being drawn as an Equestria Girl human still counts as somethign in the MLP:FiM universe. Humans of a type exist in the show (or movies of the show)
 
When it’s an OC drawn as a human with nothing linking it to the show at all it’s probably just not pony art related at all. But ultimately this is what the “barely pony related” tag is for. No one is saying the picture can’t be here.
Background Pony #AD5C
@Art-Anon
 
The artistic side obviously…
 
As a matter of fact, Fluffle Puff was also an oc drawn as a human and not one person barely had a problem about it…
Art-Anon
An Artist Who Rocks - 100+ images under their artist tag
Artist -

Dwarf Hermit
@Newguy  
That debate is one of the reasons I’m so hesitant to post some things to Derpibooru, actually. Like, where does that line fall, exactly?
 
I’ve drawn Sunny and Dulce in so many different universes now it’s kind of hard to say sometimes if all of it could be considered Pony-related.
Newguy
Artist -

I like the art, but I have to be honest, can a picture featuring humanized OC’s with none of the official MLP characters really be considered pony related?