Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Source
not provided yet
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
No description provided.
She’s THAT awesome.
So my headcanon is that pastries in general are lethal when properly prepared. I will not explain what this preparation process is. Basically, if the pastry is launched, it’s gonna hurt. Which means; Yes, Pinkie Pie was (potentially) trying to kill mega-spike. And yes, Blueblood is a bastard. Maybe slingshots with cupcakes inn them are the equivalent of guns?
The above is a statement.
It is a statement asserting that there is a causal relationship between A and B.
It asserts nothing about the actual truth value of A or the actual truth value of B.
The truth value of the statement itself (whether or not there is a causal relationship between A and B), however, is actually true when the conditional part of the relationship in question (A) is false. The statement if A then B itself is only false in the case that A turns out to be true and B turns out simultaneously to be false.
So, because pies are unquestionably not artillery, this picture’s question about the logical relationship is to be answered “Yes.” The causal relationship between (pies being artillery) and (pinkie having just shot herself in the face) is a true and correct concept until we see the specific case where pies are artillery and pinkie didn’t shoot herself in the face.
TL;DR. Pies aren’t artillery. What kind of nutjob are you :V
Are you kidding, custard has been known to kill a pony in 5 seconds.
Nah, it just means that the pie has faux filling in it.
It’s a plaster of paris mixture, like all the big stunt agencies use.
Therefore, yes, if pies are artillery then pinkie just shot herself in the face.
I’m not so sure about the “OK” part, Sugarcube. :P
Then shouldn’t the pie not have a filling?