LightningBolt 
![Thread Starter - [NO SPOILER, LEAK-FREE] Season 8 Discussion and Speculation: Discovery Family airings](https://derpicdn.net/badges/2017/7/2/0bd59d4eff9c3aeaad.svg "Thread Starter - [NO SPOILER, LEAK-FREE] Season 8 Discussion and Speculation: Discovery Family airings")
Senior Moderator
Undead inside
@Mildgyth
Yeah, would be a good idea as to not gender it.
Yeah, would be a good idea as to not gender it.
Posts
Search Results
Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 21
Solitude 
Yeah, about that.
We’ve also got tags for underwear colors, hair colors and even plain regular colors.
I agree with this but I think we’ve already past that point and kept going.
@LightningBolt
We’re not going to start tagging eye colors and various other specifics.
Yeah, about that.
We’ve also got tags for underwear colors, hair colors and even plain regular colors.
I’m strongly against this point because I don’t want people to start thinking they can start tagging slight stylistic usages in various pictures like “simple wings, simple ears, simple eyes etc” We’re going to get to a point where it becomes ridiculous
I agree with this but I think we’ve already past that point and kept going.
Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 20
Vinyl Fluff
What the Fluff?
If there’s a better term that would accurately describe it without it being confused for
Nipple Outline, I wouldn’t be against it. My original name wasn’t perfect. Solitude and I had a short discussion where we tried to figure one out that would be appropriate but non-confusing. He brought up Nondescript Nipples, and I really liked that because it was descriptive (heh, no pun intended) of the physical attributes or lackthereof of the subject, without risking getting it confused for another.Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 19
Velvet
@Vinyl Fluff
Hmmmmmmmm, yeah i guess that would apply. Maybe a different tag name would fit though.
Hmmmmmmmm, yeah i guess that would apply. Maybe a different tag name would fit though.
Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 18
Vinyl Fluff
Maybe I should give examples of what I’m tagging with this. I agree tag bloat is a bad thing, and we don’t need one for every specific style, but here’s the application here.
>>1170174
This isn’t the best example, but it’s one of the clearest ones I’ve tagged so far as I’m going through the Ember tag. There are defined nipples there. They’re not meant to be abstract or overly-simplistic, they’re just not done 100% like a mammal nipple.
>>1135738
This is another example, there’s clearly a “bump” there meant to be a nipple structure, but it’s deemphasized so it doesn’t appear out of place on a reptile. If I were to tag this with
It’s not limited just to reptiles. That’s just my main concern. It’s also used quite often on griffon characters or others with thick fur.
Also, I think e621 goes overboard on tags as well, but we do have tags for
What the Fluff?
@Vinyl Fluff
In that case, there would be no reason to tag it if every artist used that style for their reptiles. They would just search “reptile” or whatever we use for scalie stuff.inverted nipples aren’t in a similar wavelength. inverted nipples are an actual thing that happens in real life and isn’t just a nipple but simplified. Do you want various other tags like “Inverted Nondescript nipples?”@LightningBolt
We’re not going to start tagging eye colors and various other specifics.I’m strongly against this point because I don’t want people to start thinking they can start tagging slight stylistic usages in various pictures like “simple wings, simple ears, simple eyes etc” We’re going to get to a point where it becomes ridiculous
Maybe I should give examples of what I’m tagging with this. I agree tag bloat is a bad thing, and we don’t need one for every specific style, but here’s the application here.
>>1170174
This isn’t the best example, but it’s one of the clearest ones I’ve tagged so far as I’m going through the Ember tag. There are defined nipples there. They’re not meant to be abstract or overly-simplistic, they’re just not done 100% like a mammal nipple.
>>1135738
This is another example, there’s clearly a “bump” there meant to be a nipple structure, but it’s deemphasized so it doesn’t appear out of place on a reptile. If I were to tag this with
Nipples it would be gone probably within hours. However, there is a form of nipple there, so it should have some sort of nipple tag on it.It’s not limited just to reptiles. That’s just my main concern. It’s also used quite often on griffon characters or others with thick fur.
Also, I think e621 goes overboard on tags as well, but we do have tags for
Incorrect Eyecolor, and specific color underwear, socks and other garments. The latter of which I’ve always found odd.Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 17
Velvet
@Vinyl Fluff
In that case, there would be no reason to tag it if every artist used that style for their reptiles. They would just search “reptile” or whatever we use for scalie stuff.
inverted nipples aren’t in a similar wavelength. inverted nipples are an actual thing that happens in real life and isn’t just a nipple but simplified. Do you want various other tags like “Inverted Nondescript nipples?”
@LightningBolt
We’re not going to start tagging eye colors and various other specifics.
I’m strongly against this point because I don’t want people to start thinking they can start tagging slight stylistic usages in various pictures like “simple wings, simple ears, simple eyes etc” We’re going to get to a point where it becomes ridiculous
In that case, there would be no reason to tag it if every artist used that style for their reptiles. They would just search “reptile” or whatever we use for scalie stuff.
inverted nipples aren’t in a similar wavelength. inverted nipples are an actual thing that happens in real life and isn’t just a nipple but simplified. Do you want various other tags like “Inverted Nondescript nipples?”
@LightningBolt
We’re not going to start tagging eye colors and various other specifics.
I’m strongly against this point because I don’t want people to start thinking they can start tagging slight stylistic usages in various pictures like “simple wings, simple ears, simple eyes etc” We’re going to get to a point where it becomes ridiculous
Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 16
LightningBolt
Senior Moderator
Undead inside
@Velvet
Absolutely nothing wrong with precision about certain things as long as it’s objective and informative, imo.
Absolutely nothing wrong with precision about certain things as long as it’s objective and informative, imo.
Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 15
Vinyl Fluff
My main reason for wanting the tag was to enable a way to distinguish normal nipples versus this style which is used quite often for reptiles and non-mammal characters. I haven’t polled every artist, but when used in such a manner it seems to be less an abstract concept of the nipple, and more about keeping the “reptilianness” of the character, despite having breasts. Or potentially to keep the lines smooth.
In the case of mammals, such as the original image I used as an example, it’s a bang-on benefit because it also applies to them.
We’ve got an inverted nipples tag to distinguish them from normal nipples, this is in a similar vein.
What the Fluff?
@Vinyl Fluff
This tag is highly unnecessary and situational. These types of nipples are usually stylistic and are intending to be visible.
And even if you argue that they could be for non furred creatures and just say “non detailed nipples.” we’re getting down to e621 levels of specifics for stylistic choices. This just isn’t needed.
My main reason for wanting the tag was to enable a way to distinguish normal nipples versus this style which is used quite often for reptiles and non-mammal characters. I haven’t polled every artist, but when used in such a manner it seems to be less an abstract concept of the nipple, and more about keeping the “reptilianness” of the character, despite having breasts. Or potentially to keep the lines smooth.
In the case of mammals, such as the original image I used as an example, it’s a bang-on benefit because it also applies to them.
We’ve got an inverted nipples tag to distinguish them from normal nipples, this is in a similar vein.
Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 14
Velvet
@Vinyl Fluff
This tag is highly unnecessary and situational. These types of nipples are usually stylistic and are intending to be visible.
And even if you argue that they could be for non furred creatures and just say “non detailed nipples.” we’re getting down to e621 levels of specifics for stylistic choices. This just isn’t needed.
This tag is highly unnecessary and situational. These types of nipples are usually stylistic and are intending to be visible.
And even if you argue that they could be for non furred creatures and just say “non detailed nipples.” we’re getting down to e621 levels of specifics for stylistic choices. This just isn’t needed.
Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 13
Vinyl Fluff
What the Fluff?
@Rdobet
If the tag is clear, I’m all for it. But as I mentioned in the previous thread, I’d personally rather
If the tag is clear, I’m all for it. But as I mentioned in the previous thread, I’d personally rather
Nipple Outline not be aliased since it implies visible clothed nipples, which is (as lots of things are) a fetish. If it gets aliased then the two would be intermingled.Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 12
Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 11
Oatsy 
Sometimes Not Dead
@Vinyl Fluff
Tbh, I’d rather your previous idea for
I think a few other mods agree, just uhh, gimme a minute.
Tbh, I’d rather your previous idea for
obscured nipples and perhaps aliasing nipple outline into that tag since obscured is more intuitive and encompassingI think a few other mods agree, just uhh, gimme a minute.
Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 10
Solitude
@Vinyl Fluff
@Rdobet
Yeah, the bumps is kinda what we were aiming for since that’s how they’re usually depicted far as I can tell.
Also: thanks for the swift reply, you bunch.
@Rdobet
Yeah, the bumps is kinda what we were aiming for since that’s how they’re usually depicted far as I can tell.
Also: thanks for the swift reply, you bunch.
Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 9
Vinyl Fluff
Cool.
Thanks.
What the Fluff?
@Vinyl Fluff
I don’t see any issue with that tag, as long as we are clear on what it refers to.
@Vinyl Fluff
Tag is fine.
Cool.
Nondescript Nipples is now a tag. I’ll type up a description and slap it in its own thread, unless putting it here is preferred.Thanks.
Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 7
ArmadilloEater
French Taunter
@Solitude
@Vinyl Fluff
I don’t see any issue with that tag, as long as we are clear on what it refers to.
@LightningBolt
>>598864t (deleted)
@Vinyl Fluff
I don’t see any issue with that tag, as long as we are clear on what it refers to.
@LightningBolt
>>598864t (deleted)
Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 4
LightningBolt
Senior Moderator
Undead inside
>not letting the one with tag changes in her title start the thread
You really dropped the ball there.
You really dropped the ball there.
Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 3
Vinyl Fluff
I was actually in the process of doing a quick recap here, but you saved me the time. Thanks.
What the Fluff?
I’mma note that now the old thread’s closed up before there was an answer, if any of the mods have some time in between to review Vinyl Fluff’s request for a new tag and give a go/no-go on it it’d be appreciated.
I was actually in the process of doing a quick recap here, but you saved me the time. Thanks.
Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 2
Solitude
I’mma note that now the old thread’s closed up before there was an answer, if any of the mods have some time in between to review Vinyl Fluff’s request for a new tag and give a go/no-go on it it’d be appreciated.
Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Topic Opener
ArmadilloEater
French Taunter
This thread is for any tag discussions you might want to have that are not direct requests, like aliases or implications. Those should be posted in their own threads, as explained in the How to.
In the spirit of the old DB WORKSHOP, feel free to discuss anything tag related, like the creation of new tags(Background pony names for example), explanations on how to use certain tags, or any issue you think is worth talking about really. The mass deleting of a tag should always be discussed, doing so without the accord of a staff member is considered tag vandalism, and is a bannable offense.
Remember to hide spoilers for recently aired episodes and keep the debates civil.
In the spirit of the old DB WORKSHOP, feel free to discuss anything tag related, like the creation of new tags
Remember to hide spoilers for recently aired episodes and keep the debates civil.
Showing results 17851 - 17875 of 17875 total
Default search
If you do not specify a field to search over, the search engine will search for posts with a body that is similar to the query's word stems. For example, posts containing the words winged humanization, wings, and spread wings would all be found by a search for wing, but sewing would not be.
Allowed fields
| Field Selector | Type | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
author | Literal | Matches the author of this post. Anonymous authors will never match this term. | author:Joey |
body | Full Text | Matches the body of this post. This is the default field. | body:test |
created_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation time of this post. | created_at:2015 |
id | Numeric Range | Matches the numeric surrogate key for this post. | id:1000000 |
my | Meta | my:posts matches posts you have posted if you are signed in. | my:posts |
subject | Full Text | Matches the title of the topic. | subject:time wasting thread |
topic_id | Literal | Matches the numeric surrogate key for the topic this post belongs to. | topic_id:7000 |
topic_position | Numeric Range | Matches the offset from the beginning of the topic of this post. Positions begin at 0. | topic_position:0 |
updated_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation or last edit time of this post. | updated_at.gte:2 weeks ago |
user_id | Literal | Matches posts with the specified user_id. Anonymous users will never match this term. | user_id:211190 |
forum | Literal | Matches the short name for the forum this post belongs to. | forum:meta |