Tag Implications

I think there was a good reason why this wasn’t done, but I don’t remember what it is, so…
 
human on pony action -> interspecies

“what would x do for a fistful of yen?” aliased to “fistful of yen”, which should then imply “meme” and “exploitable meme”

flash’s paper -> exploitable meme

This needs to be said again: human on pony action should NOT imply pony on human action. pony on human action is solely for ponies penetrating humans.

carlos, carlosjack -> exploitable meme

rarity, Imma snuggle you, snuggling, etc -> snuggles

griffonized→species swap, griffon

@Whatevs  
I don’t think “rarity” should imply “snuggles”.

Should “heart eyes” imply “love heart”?

ask-derpyspanish should imply spanish.

@Keith Mowz  
I oppose the idea.  
It’s not like blogs are conceptually bound to a single language.

@BigMax  
Considering I just had to add the tag to over thirty of them yesterday, I think its more than fair to generalize when the language is implied in the name of the blog.

@Keith Mowz  
What if a post has no actual dialogue? Should you tag it as “spanish”?  
And would you add these implications for every non-English blog?  
I may be wrong, but that’s not gonna happen.  
I don’t even think it’s the point of tag implications.

fistful of yen -> exploitable meme
 
Or I think that counts, at least.

Should “hat” imply “clothes”?

tag census -> tags

“bikini” should imply “swimsuit” like how “one-piece swimsuit” already does

Should “kimono (clothing)” imply “clothes”?

custom toy -> custom, toy  
custom pony -> custom

wonderbolt trainee uniform -> uniform

bon bon is not amused -> unamused

lunamac -> princess luna, big macintosh, straight, shipping

edit: nevermind, ignore this post

@RIG  
^{Offtopic: Tag Aliases now have their brand new own thread that is basically the same but asks users that report artist merges to give an URL or at least something that will make the mods’ life a ton easier.}
 
Ontopic: TSP is this “your” thread like how Tag Aliases is mine? I know I did a few random ones that either annoyed me (fistful of yen) or were relevant to my own interests (lunamac) but I’m not sure how many of these are getting done?

In light of barbeque’s post, and the few times I’ve had to explain the change and its problems, I’ll bump a post I made here a month ago.
 
@Vercci  

 
And to expand slightly, the two tags garner two different audiences that are interested in different things. By far, the majority of people have been interested in putting penis inside their best pone. Nowhere near as much people want pone penis inside ‘us’.
 
I also forgot to think about gays at the time of the original post.‘human on pony action’ is more accurately used with human penis inside a pony, and ‘pony on human action’ is again pony pen0r inside human booty, in one form or another. If there’s no obvious penetration, the more dominant “human” or “pony” gets to have the tag instead. And for that magic case of a human and a pony managing to penetrate each other at the same time, that’d be a legitimate case of both tags on the same image.
 
And no, I never thought I’d have to ever gratuitously describe any of this.