@Pagan  

 
first*

@Jarkes  
It wasn’t bad, and the animation & voice acting was quite well done. (Even had some of the voices from the original movie, including Fievel’s original voice.) Still, I kinda prefer the original.
 
Though, Don Bluth wasn’t involved in the sequel at all. It was said he was offered the role as director of it, and considered it, but turned it down. This is why the movie didn’t quite have the same art style, and “feel” as the original did. It was also a li’l less dark, a bit more comical, as well. Though, that scorpion sure was creepy. Still, it wasn’t bad.
 
Better then the other Don Bluth movie sequels. (Which Don wasn’t involved with either.)

@Jarkes  
It was a good movie it was one of the movies I ever saw as a kid.

@Beau Skunky
 
Fievel Goes West was probably the only sequel to a Don Bluth movie that was actually as good as the original, possibly even better… Though it probably helped that it was still a theatrical film and I think Bluth still had involvement in that one…

@Background Pony Number 17  
Are you sure they wouldn’t be jealous? The Derpfish is quite rare, and makes a good pet.

Better throw it back before the other fishermen see you caught it and laugh at you.

@Pagan  
Exactly

@bigladiesman  
Monty Python?

As for me, I’m getting vibes from another movie:
 
“Morning…”  
“Morning…”  
“Morning…”

@Beau Skunky  
Yeah I have seen those.

@Pagan  
Oh yeah, “Fievel Goes West.”
 
There really are “dog fish,” though they look more like sharks.

@Beau Skunky  
The dog fish part it was just like this but with a dog head.

@Pagan  
Why is that?

I’m getting flashbacks to an American Tail.