Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Champions of Equestria

Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!

Description

There is argument about IDW comic not being canon as age difference. We see in cutie mark chronicles same “age difference” showed in IDW comic. Just to point that out

safe2276598 edit181764 edited screencap96111 idw22538 screencap303344 amethyst star3199 berry punch7804 berryshine7804 bon bon19615 candy mane397 carrot top6437 cherry berry2747 cherry cola680 cherry fizzy738 cloud kicker2550 derpy hooves59659 dizzy twister1455 doctor whooves12184 golden harvest6437 lemon hearts2779 lightning bolt1242 linky2112 lyra heartstrings35347 minuette7220 moondancer6378 orange box47 orange swirl1455 ponet559 shoeshine2223 sparkler3199 sweetie drops19615 time turner12184 twilight sparkle370934 twinkleshine2957 white lightning1242 pegasus540485 pony1706040 g42119047 my little pony: friendship is magic268794 the cutie mark chronicles1260 clone3634 comparison5425 drama3359 female1907056 male587969 mare811152 missing horn1253 stallion214599
Source

Comments

Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ ~sub~

Detailed syntax guide

Background Pony #0111
@Background Pony #7860  
A good non-pony example of this is Kung Fu Panda: Legends of Awesomeness. Everything is resolved and the characters are fine with each other at the end of the episode…only for the next one to come along and hit the reset button, bringing everything back to square bucking one again!
Background Pony #E6DE
@Background Pony #7260  
Background information, like on the toys, do not provide a story, but merely a setting. Stories require more than that.
 
If the storybooks do not assume that the readers knowledge of the show, and the events of the show did not happen in them, then they are their own primary medium. Similarly, the show is it’s own primary medium. In comparison, the comics are a secondary medium as the events of the show explicitly happened in their continuity as mentioned and shown in the comics, and are referred to such by Hasbro and its writers.
Background Pony #AD25
@Background Pony #7860  
the toys have a background story written on the back of the packaging.  
yes, it’s rubbish, but arbitrarily stating that only the “primary medium” is just as unfounded. Besides, the MLP:FiM picturebook was released on the same day as the first airing of the show. Look it up at mlp dot wikia dot com/wiki/List_of_storybooks  
How do you decide what is primary? Maybe the picturebooks are the One True Canon then?
Background Pony #E6DE
@Background Pony #7260  
The toys don’t have a story, and thus are not the primary medium when defining the canon. The show is the primary medium that has a story, and thus defines the canon.
Background Pony #E6DE
@Background Pony #7260  
The basis that one rejects the comics as canon is that there’s a combination of the facts that they’re not part of the primary medium, they’re not written by the same writers concurrent with the primary medium, the writers of the primary medium have not said that the events in them happened, and the writers of the primary medium have said that they do not take the events, characters, or settings in said comics into account whatsoever when they create material for the primary medium. It’s no different than Star Wars, where the movies and the newer Clone Wars series are canon, and nothing else, or countless manga, whose anime adaptations and movies are not canon.
 
Plus, you’re overgeneralizing. There’s a difference between small background elements being incongruent, like duplicate background ponies or Minuette being an adult in that season 1 flashback, and significant events or focus characters being incongruent. The former affects nothing, while the latter significantly affects the integrity of the plot. It’s not proof by itself that the comics aren’t canon, but it’s evidence that the events in them are impossible to have happened in the show’s timeline of events.
dynamicv

@Lyra_Heartstrings  
This comic came out before season 4, and was put up for pre-order at least as far back as May 15, 2012. That’s a month after A Canterlot Wedding aired.
 
The background ponies were literally “background ponies” in earlier seasons. This comic was made using the material available at the time, and isn’t any more wrong than those early episodes. Everything gets an equal dose of retcon.
Background Pony #AD25
@Background Pony #7860  
“It doesn’t need to be 100% correct for there to be a canon”  
That is precisely what the anti-comic people are saying. comics only 99.9% correct, therefore comics not canon. destrooooy
 
and the reason why BG characters are so incomprehensible is, as Larson has said, there is no such thing as a background CHARACTER. They aren’t characters, they are filler, no identities, no personalities, no character. The artists just put in what they think is pretty. In scripts the speaking BG ponies aren’t even named, it’s pony1 pony2, and whatever pony template is used changes from episode to episode.
 
So either go the purist way, demanding that canon must be 100% correct and accept that with the way MLP is made it is impossible to have canonicity. (also applies to almost any other fiction, including Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings, etc)  
Or, accept that slight “errors” are impossible to avoid and ignore the varying age differences and other minor oddities. This implies there is no basis to reject the comics or movies as canon.  
In short, either everything is canon or nothing is. There truly is no other way without making up irrelevant rules which have nothing to do with canonicity.