Uploaded by Background Pony #020B
800x490 PNG 649 kBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH safe2276550 +-SH idw22536 +-SH angel bunny11770 +-SH applejack208193 +-SH fluttershy268315 +-SH gummy5860 +-SH opalescence2478 +-SH owlowiscious2304 +-SH pinkie pie266250 +-SH rainbow dash290517 +-SH rarity225724 +-SH spike95367 +-SH tank3241 +-SH twilight sparkle370927 +-SH winona2928 +-SH alicorn335827 +-SH pony1705997 +-SH g42119012 +-SH exploitable meme33807 +-SH female1907015 +-SH mane 6 interests285 +-SH mare811132 +-SH meme97211 +-SH pet2355 +-SH twilight sparkle (alicorn)154994 +-SH vulgar26343
Source
not provided yet
Loading...
Loading...
Yeah, I just wanted to expand on that before someone objected that some language does merit an automatic R rating.
That’s kind of exactly what I was saying with the sentence “That’s not how it works on here.”
The below comment. Not sure how i tagged the other guy twice. o.o
@Background Pony #74EE
Well, the tag seems to be gone now so there’s that then.
But, i’ve no idea then why it was there. Someone at one point found something questionable. Maybe they’ll come back one day and clarify why.
@Background Pony #2B0A
The tags here aren’t like movie, TV, or video game ratings, despite some vague similarities. “questionable” and “explicit” are solely about sexually-themed content, whereas violence, language, and adult themes aren’t really addressed in the rating tags (except insofar as “semi-grimdark” and “grimdark” can apply to graphic or extreme violence or its aftermath, and “suggestive” can apply to innuendos and implications). Hence the “vulgar” tag, which isn’t strictly a rating tag but is supposed to be used on images where the language isn’t “family friendly”.
At least, that’s the impression I get.
questionable
things on here, what with their tendency to feature boobs, are more of an R-rated thing, while calling someone a dick is certainly not.Also, that’s not how it works on here.
@Swashbucklist
@Background Pony #2B0A
Maybe it’s cuz Fluttershy called Angel a dick. I feel as if that’s questionable language for a young one to hear.
But it’s clearly saying he’s not a pet. And there’s no reason that that in itself should make this image
questionable
.For the notion that Spike might be considered a pet, perhaps. I’d sure bump the rating up for that B.S.
WHAT?!
She’s probably read all the fics and shizz where ponies keep calling him that.