Why would you use Fluttershy as an anti-pot mouthpiece then wish everyone a happy 4/20? ._.

@Background Pony #358C  
It says Marijuana, smart one.

Anyone who thinks weed is in eggs must be smoking some.

@Niggoslav_Krawczyk  

@Silent Wing That’s all entirely up to interpretation, sonnyboy!  

@Background Pony #1577  
It’s called life, and you don’t smoke it. You live it.

@Prof.NightJack  
*to destroy hemp
 
 
@Background Pony #8E62  
There, problem?

@Prof.NightJack  
>the ability to hemp  
I think you hemped a bit too hard there.

Holy fuck Silent Wing, I need to get some of the shit you’re smoking; ’cuz you my friend, are waaaaaay out there.

@Silent Wing  
But you have to admit the legal problem caused by the laws on marijuana that effect the growing of hemp is a problem.  
And to allow the destruction of the variety of cannabis that marijuana comes from would make people think “why not destroy all varieties of cannabis”, so it would give people that don’t know the difference the ability to hemp as well, so it’s a problem.

@Prof.NightJack  
Actually, I would consider hemp to be useful, as it’s considered a wonderful home insulator, among other things.

@Prof.NightJack  
Case in point, hemp is another varieties of cannabis and one can not get high off it, and there is a lot of legal problem that come from it’s relation to marijuana, being another variant of cannabis, and most states it’s not legal to cultivate hemp when there is no real reason for it.

@Silent Wing  
I think there need to be a better way to control it but the ways you keep saying are not it by a long shot, they will only cause more problem, after all most real problems with marijuana come from people breaking the law over it and not from the use of it.

@Prof.NightJack  
So you’re implying you have a partial agreement to my beliefs then? Because the last time I saw it, 100% against means no alignment.

@Silent Wing  
Yep, you talk about the other side as the immature ones yet take to most immature view of the whole thing, the “If your not with me 100% then you can only be against me” view…

@Prof.NightJack  
I wish to handle it with extreme force and prejudice. Besides, why would you even care? You’re siding with those whom I’m against.

@Silent Wing  
And I’ll just point out the problem with your idea of how to handle it.  
Going to the extreme is not the best option.

@Prof.NightJack  
Neither, I just don’t care how “useful* you guys think it is. I stick with my beliefs and pushing towards eradication through means of selective herbicide.

@Silent Wing  
Yet you don’t provide any real prove of your argument being the right one other then your personal views, and others have pointed out real reason that it’s can be helpful.  
So please first prove ever other person here that has argued with you worng before you say they are wrong.  
Myself and others already talked to you about it here, or do you have selective memory and sight?

@Prof.NightJack  
I absolutely adore your feeble attempts to use my reasoning against me. It’s quite funny, and the more you do it, the more I laugh.
 
Anyway, I do not believe it has any reason to actually be in the environment. Otherwise, why would we not have (almost) eradicated polio? It’s natural and deadly to humans. By your logic, let’s just keep everything harmful present! I wait for the day you develop cancer and live a different life. While I assist with some way to eradicate cancer, you’ll wish to keep it present.
 
Please, prove me wrong. I’m dying to hear your opinion.  

@Silent Wing  
Problem is it’s also unintelligent that think it’s a good idea to eradicate something and the people that use it, they don’t understand that it is a worse was to think that will not just cause more problem.  
As stated before it is important to it’s natural habitat, and to get rid of it there is to cause harm to the environment, but as you said “immature people will not listen to reason”.

@Background Pony #AFC8  
Maybe people is a bit harsh in that factor, but how’re we going to stop riots of those I consider unintelligent? I mean, immature people will not listen to reason. I will not expect them to take something such as their lifeline (that’s a joke) being destroyed and not fighting back.
 
But, until I can get enough people to agree, I will wait until stupidity causes itself to die. Let them smoke themselves to death. I’ll laugh when they get a funeral, and laugh harder when I’m dancing.

@Background Pony #AFC8  
No, my logic is banning something that is dangerous. Although everything humans can make is potentially dangerous (that’s actually a fact), I don’t classify any kind of drug as “safe bro pl0x!” or any other kind of phrase idiots use.
 
Besides, I don’t want to ban it, I want to eradicate it. And the people that use it. That includes my father. It’s for the better of humanity, in my opinion.

@Silent Wing  
>For instance, how would you like it if you were on a plane  
>What if you’re at a restaurant  
>What if a guy goes up to your children
 
I cannot begin to describe how insanely unrealistic these situations are.
 
By your logic, we should ban everything because everything is potentially dangerous.

Oh, oh god… This comment section… I’m dying over here