Uploaded by Beatfox
2361x2539 PNG 2.63 MB
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH safe2288236 +-SH artist:xnightmelody216 +-SH tree of harmony891 +-SH oc1014850 +-SH oc only742801 +-SH oc:harmony (heilos)94 +-SH classical unicorn5927 +-SH pony1718203 +-SH g42129370 +-SH big crown thingy3324 +-SH cloven hooves18486 +-SH high res412218 +-SH horn255511 +-SH leonine tail16069 +-SH ponified54618 +-SH simple background648107 +-SH solo1508651 +-SH transparent background304684 +-SH unshorn fetlocks55330
Loading...
Loading...
Only just caught it, sorry. I’m just askin’, since it looked like he was acting like he was a mod and pseudo-modding is usually frowned on in my experience.
This conversation ended amicably a month ago. There’s no need to dredge it back up.
FFS man, who made you a moderator?
I agree that that ought to be the general rule. However, I think that for certain rare cases such as this - where one very specific ponification takes on a life of its own, so to speak - there’s room for flexibility.
ponification is used for pics of ponies that were based from a pre-existing character not created by the artist.
Where is the conflict? Who says they must be mutually exclusive?
then this creates a conflict, the ponification and oc tags oppose each other, i guess ponification should be axed.
The creator of this ponification considers her as an OC for herself (see here) - she even named her “Harmony”. I’d say the character’s distinctiveness and volume of artwork qualifies it for that tag.
It’s similar to how Nyx is considered an OC, even though she is in essence Nightmare Moon reborn.