Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
THIS
IS
A
POTENTIALLY HORRIBLE BUT BRILLIANT IDEA
IS
A
POTENTIALLY HORRIBLE BUT BRILLIANT IDEA
Source
not provided yet
Oh my god what keeps dragging me back here.
Wait I replied to this a year ago?
It’s a trap!
I understand now, kind of.
>>419271
Just want to let everyone here know that the image is on the booru, but without the text.
>>419273
Twice in fact.
You don’t understand how anal some people are about tags. We have people holler down our throats daily because they searched for X and found Y that didn’t contain X but just a mention of it in the description or was tangentially related to X in the vaguest of ways. Having images like this showing up in unrelated searches would rustle so many jimmies you could power a small town off the static. And as funny as it may seem on one image, on a hundred it’s kind of a problem.
@MeshGearFox
Unless any genitals/fluids or show, or Pinkie is somehow managing to get penetrated by the safe, it’s still questionable.
@fromanussum
The image isn’t against the site rules. Following the image rules is against the site rules.
Yes, that’s a headfuck, but that’s what rules usually are like,
…
stop acting stupidly
Okay, so how do you tag it if she’s having sex with a questionable?
I disagree with that statement, but I see the point you are trying to make. I still think that’s a little into the “slippery slope” of suddenly meta data everywhere becomes useless, but I digress.
Alright I see what you mean and That makes sense. I’ll keep to myself and be sure not to do this again.
pp, questionable, humping, solo female, safe (object),
What if you have a picture of Pinkie Pie banging a safe?
How do you tag that?
Breaking the law! Breaking the law!
“One single image”
Do you honestly think this is the first time this sort of thing has happened? Really? That this is a unique, original stunt?
No. This sort of things happens every few days. And if we allow it in any instance, then we must allow it in all instances. And in doing so we make metadata useless. Which makes the site useless.
That’s a very robotic way of looking at things. One single image out of whack isn’t going to throw the entire system into unpreventable turmoil.
Since you’re a mod I have no say in the matter. Merely expression my dissatisfaction with the situation.
Yes, it does.
If someone searches for “*celestia*” and gets this image, you’ve fucked with the system. And that is wrong. And I will ban anyone that thinks that sort of thing is funny.
Okay. I won’t do it.
Does it really constituent vandalism if it’s intentionally implied by the image? It’s not like folks are going from image to image borking meta data.
Metadata vandalism will lead to bans, Don’t.
>implying I didn’t already know that.
I just wanted an excuse to give a grandiose speech. You have to admit, I did a pretty good job.
>implying i wanted to ruin the party
>implying i am not doing this for the lulz