Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
He’s so special and enlightened.
Fun fact: That’s crap. I have documented proof that that’s not what happens when you Google Princess Celestia with SafeSearch on.
Fun fact: That’s crap. I have documented proof that that’s not what happens when you Google Princess Celestia with SafeSearch on.
Just in case anyone else wants it.
And 14 year olds? I looked at much crazier, ACTUAL RAPE based stories when I was younger. Didn’t make me into some psychopath. You look at it, you move on. This idea that people are supposed to be this model to kids is ridiculous. Adult aged fans can have their black humor fun. Not everybody are supposed to be nannies for little kids. Typical social justice warrior projection.
Allow me to explain (as I tried to do in the thread): In the first few months of APM, Molestia was based off of the Molestia from some grimdark fic (I never managed to get very far, as it wasn’t interesting in any way, and I’ve read a few grimdark fics that I actually do like). The tone was darker (albeit subtly) and Molestia made jokes about rape (most of them seem to be to illustrate that she’s not exactly the most moral of ponies). However, during that time, John Joseco also got asks that he decided to answer about Molestia’s character outside of raping ponies, and as he developed the character more, he tossed out the darker tone and the rape all in one go.
The contrast is lampshaded a couple times in the blog. In this past year’s Mother’s Day arc, for example, Luna says that Molestia has been “a lot better lately” (in reference to Molly’s worrying that her mother will be very disappointed in her). Furthermore, in earlier blog entries, Luna was seen willingly participating in sex acts with Molestia. In a recent entry, however, Luna claimed that she’d never even kissed anyone else before.
The point is not to show that the character’s changed, but rather that the early stuff is not actually canon with the current stuff. John Joseco doesn’t actually post out-of-character stuff (like an OOC post stating that everything before X date is non-canon), nor does he remove posts.
LOL!
Yes, this actually came from an actual Disney cartoon.
(“Molest” originally ment “to pester, annoy, or bother.”)
Oh hey, the guy just summed up the DWM movement without even realizing it. Newsflash! Molestation =/= Rape! By claiming it is, you have therefore shown your ignorance, and total lack of understanding of what rape actually is! Good job.
Depends on who’s computer it was, IIRC she said she got upset over it when a girl she was babysitting found it, so was it her computer or one at the girl’s house.
The odds would still be stack against them, though.
Also, wasn’t it stated many times that the tumblr/blog series these people are protesting doesn’t even feature “rape” in it? (Yet, they keep insisting it does.)
@ChickNeighney
You have a point, isn’t child-abuse bad to? (Even if I hate that “Johnny Test” show.)
Saw that. It really does bring the question what the yay was on PP cookies.
Mmmm… That irony…
You’d think that, but no. Contra just tends to make posts like these.
A couple hours ago, 4chan did a test in which they removed all of their cookies and did a Google search in both regular and Ingocnito mode. In several tries, only one user had an obvious APM comic show up, and that was because they didn’t delete their cookies and searched specifically for “Princess Celestia comic.”
The comic was not even one of Molestia doing something bad. It was actually one of Twilight getting the upper hand on a non-Molest-mode Celestia.