Policy Update - Rules changes incoming for AI content - Read Here

Viewing last 25 versions of comment by Background Pony #3C75 on image #3346978

Background Pony #3C75
[@sammykun](/images/3346978#comment_10888647)
It's less supporting incest and more hating people who endorce hate speech. If you actually read my comments, you'd see that I never defended incest once. The only thing even remotely close was saying I'd look into those artists out of spite. What I did do was speak out against targeting people with hate speech because of an opinion online.

Also, fun fact, are you aware that if I go on your profile and filter your favorites by "incest" I get 15 results, many of which are not only explicit, but depict the same ship as in this post? True facts. The most recent one was only a year ago, so you havent been incest free for long. By-the-by, two of those images have what looks like a barely-legal, still almost flat-chested, pseudo-aged up human Apple Bloom in them. And don't even get me started on the young, human Apple Bloom dakimakura you favorited and all *that* implies. Also, I wouldn't suggest removing them and claiming they weren't there to try and defend your hypocrisy. I've got screenshots. Sucks when it's happening to you, huh?
: )

Stones and glass houses, friend. Try to be more polite next time, and maybe you won't get destroyed by words.
No reason given
Edited by Background Pony #3C75
Background Pony #3C75
[@sammykun](/images/3346978#comment_10888647)
It's less supporting incest and more hating people who endorce hate speech. If you actually read my comments, you'd see that I never defended incest once. The only thing even remotely close was saying I'd look into those artists out of spite. What I did do was speak out against targeting people with hate speech because of an opinion online.

Also, fun fact, are you aware that if I go on your profile and filter your favorites by "incest" I get 15 results, many of which are not only explicit, but depict the same ship as in this post? True facts. The most recent one was only a year ago, so you havent been incest free for long. By-the-by, two of those images have what looks like a barely-legal, still almost flat-chested, pseudo-aged up human Apple Bloom in them. And don't even get me started on the young, human Apple Bloom dakimakura you favorited and all *that* implies. Also, I wouldn't suggest removing them and claiming they weren't there to try and defend your hypocrisy. I've got screenshots. Sucks when it's happening to you, doesn't ithuh?
: )

Stones and glass houses, friend. Try to be more polite next time, and maybe you won't get destroyed by words.
No reason given
Edited by Background Pony #3C75
Background Pony #3C75
[@sammykun](/images/3346978#comment_10888647)
It's less supporting incest and more hating people who endorce hate speech. If you actually read my comments, you'd see that I never defended incest once. The only thing even remotely close was saying I'd look into those artists out of spite. What I did do was speak out against targeting people with hate speech because of an opinion online.

Also, fun fact, are you aware that if I go on your profile and filter your favorites by "incest" I get 15 results, many of which are not only explicit, but depict the same ship as in this post? True facts. The most recent one was only a year ago, so you havent been incest free for long. By-the-by, two of those images have what looks like a barely-legal, still almost flat-chested, pseudo-aged up human Apple Bloom in them. And don't even get me started on the young, human Apple Bloom dakimakura you favorited and all *that* implies. Also, I wouldn't suggest removing them and claiming they weren't there to try and defend your hypocrisy. I've got screenshots. Sucks when it's happening to you, doesn't it?
: )

Stones and glass houses, friend. Try to be more polite next time, and maybe you won't get destroyed by words.
No reason given
Edited by Background Pony #3C75
Background Pony #3C75
[@sammykun](/images/3346978#comment_10888647)
It's less supporting incest and more hating people who endorce hate speech. If you actually read my comments, you'd see that I never defended incest once. The only thing even remotely close was saying I'd look into those artists out of spite. What I did do was speak out against targeting people with hate speech because of an opinion online.

Also, fun fact, are you aware that if I go on your profile and filter your favorites by "incest" I get 15 results, many of which are not only explicit, but depict the same ship as in this post? True facts. The most recent one was only a year ago, so you havent been incest free for long. By-the-by, two of those images have what looks like a barely-legal, still almost flat-chested, pseudo-aged up human Apple Bloom in them. Also, I wouldn't suggest removing them and claiming they weren't there to try and defend your hypocrisy. I've got screenshots.
: )

Stones and glass houses, friend. Try to be more polite next time, and maybe you won't get destroyed by words.
No reason given
Edited by Background Pony #3C75
Background Pony #3C75
[@sammykun](/images/3346978#comment_10888647)
It's less supporting incest and more hating people who endorce hate speech. Like you, apparently. If you actually read my comments, you'd see that I never defended incest once. The only thing even remotely close was saying I'd look into those artists out of spite. What I did do was speak out against targeting people with hate speech because of an opinion online.

Also, fun fact, are you aware that if I go on your profile and filter your favorites by "incest" I get 15 results, many of which are not only explicit, but depict the same ship as in this post? True facts. The most recent one was only a year ago, so you havent been incest free for long. By-the-by, two of those images have what looks like a barely-legal, still almost flat-chested, pseudo-aged up human Apple Bloom in them. Also, I wouldn't suggest removing them and claiming they weren't there to try and defend your hypocrisy. I've got screenshots.
: )

Stones and glass houses, friend. Try to be more polite.
No reason given
Edited by Background Pony #3C75
Background Pony #3C75
[@sammykun](/images/3346978#comment_10888647)
It's less supporting incest and more hating people who endorce hate speech. Like you, apparently. If you actually read my comments, you'd see that I never defended incest once. The only thing even remotely close was saying I'd look into those artists out of spite. What I did do was speak out against targeting people with hate speech because of an opinion online.

Also, fun fact, are you aware that if I go on your profile and filter your favorites by "incest" I get 15 very imagesults, many of which are not only explicit, but depict the same ship as in this post? True facts. The most recent one was only a year ago, so you havent been incest free for long. By-the-by, two of those images have what looks like a barely-legal, still almost flat-chested, pseudo-aged up human Apple Bloom in them. Also, I wouldn't suggest removing them and claiming they weren't there to try and defend your hypocrisy. I've got screenshots.
: )

Stones and glass houses, friend. Try to be more polite.
No reason given
Edited by Background Pony #3C75
Background Pony #3C75
[@sammykun](/images/3346978#comment_10888647)
It's less supporting incest and more hating people who endorce hate speech. Like you, apparently. If you actually read my comments, you'd see that I never defended incest once. The only thing even remotely close was saying I'd look into those artists out of spite. What I did do was speak out against targeting people with hate speech because of an opinion online.

Also, fun fact, are you aware that if I go on your profile and filter your favorites by "incest" I get 15 very images, many of which are not only explicit, but depict the same ship as in this post? True facts. HThe most recent one was only a year ago, so you havent been incest free for long. By-the-by, two of those images have what looks like a barely-legal, still almost flat-chested, pseudo-aged up human Apple Bloom in them. Also, I wouldn't suggest removing them and claiming they weren't there to try and defend your hypocrisy. I've got screenshots.
: )

Stones and glass houses, friend. Try to be more polite.
No reason given
Edited by Background Pony #3C75
Background Pony #3C75
[@sammykun](/images/3346978#comment_10888647)
It's less supporting incest and more hating people who endorce hate speech. Like you, apparently. If you actually read my comments, you'd see that I never defended incest once. The only thing even remotely close was saying I'd look into those artists out of spite. What I did do was speak out against targeting people with hate speech because of an opinion online.

Also, fun fact, are you aware that if I go on your profile and filter your favorites by "incest" I get 15 very images, many of which ardcore, not only explicit, but depimct the sagme ship as in this post? True facts. Hell, two of those images have what looks like a barely-legal, still almost flat-chested, pseudo-aged up human Apple Bloom in them. Also, I wouldn't suggest removing them and claiming they weren't there to try and defend your hypocrisy. I've got screenshots.
: )

Stones and glass houses, friend. Try to be more polite.
No reason given
Edited by Background Pony #3C75
Background Pony #3C75
[@sammykun](/images/3346978#comment_10888647)
It's less supporting incest and more hating people who endorce hate speech. Like you, apparently. If you actually read my comments, you'd see that I never defended incest once. The only thing even remotely close was saying I'd look into those artists out of spite. What I did do was speak out against targeting people with hate speech because of an opinion online.

Also, fun fact, are you aware that if I go on your profile and filter your favorites by "incest" I get 15 very hardcore, explicit images? True facts. Hell, two of those images have what looks like a barely-legal, still almost flat-chested, pseudo-aged up humamn Apple Bloom in them. Also, I wouldn't suggest removing them and claiming they weren't there to try and defend your hypocrisy. I've got screenshots.
: )

Stones and glass houses, friend. Try to be more polite.
No reason given
Edited by Background Pony #3C75
Background Pony #3C75
[@sammykun](/images/3346978#comment_10888647)
It's less supporting incest and more hating people who endorce hate speech. Like you, apparently. If you actually read my comments, you'd see that I never defended incest once. The only thing even remotely close was saying I'd look into those artists out of spite. What I did do was speak out against targeting people with discriminhatorye intspentech because of an opinion online.

Also, fun fact, are you aware that if I go on your profile and filter your favorites by "incest" I get 15 very hardcore, explicit images? True facts. Hell, two of those images have what looks like a barely-legal, still almost flat-chested, pseudo-aged up humam Apple Bloom in them. Also, I wouldn't suggest removing them and claiming they weren't there to try and defend your hypocrisy. I've got screenshots.
: )

Stones and glass houses, friend. Try to be more polite.
No reason given
Edited by Background Pony #3C75
Background Pony #3C75
[@sammykun](/images/3346978#comment_10888647)
It's less supporting incest and more hating people who endorce hate speech. Like you, apparently. If you actually read my comments, you'd see that I never defended incest once. The only thing even remotely close was saying I'd look into those artists out of spite. What I did do was speak out against targeting people with discriminatory intent because of an opinion.

Also, fun fact, are you aware that if I go on your profile and filter your favorites by "incest" I get 15 very hardcore, explicit images? True facts. Hell, two of those images have what looks like a barely-legal, still almost flat-chested, pseudo-aged up humam Apple Bloom in them. Also, I wouldn't suggest removing them and claiming they weren't there to try and defend your hypocrisy. I've got screenshots.
: )

Stones and glass houses, friend. Try to be more polite.
No reason given
Edited by Background Pony #3C75
Background Pony #3C75
[@sammykun](/images/3346978#comment_10888647)
It's less supporting incest and more hating people who endorce hate speech. Like you, apparently. If you actually read my comments, you'd see that I never defended incest once. The only thing even remotely close was saying I'd look into those artists out of spite.

Also, fun fact, are you aware that if I go on your profile and filter your favorites by "incest" I get 15 very hardcore, explicit images? True facts. Hell, two of those images have what looks like a barely-legal, still almost flat-chested, pseudo-aged up humam Apple Bloom in them. Also, I wouldn't suggest removing them and claiming they weren't there to try and defend your hypocrisy. I've got screenshots.
: )

Stones and glass houses, friend. Try to be more polite.
No reason given
Edited by Background Pony #3C75
Background Pony #3C75
[@sammykun](/images/3346978#comment_10888647)
It's less supporting incest and more hating people who endorce hate speech. Like you, apparently. If you actually read my comments, you'd see that I never defended incest once. The only thing even remotely close was saying I'd look into those artists out of spite.

Also, fun fact, are you aware that if I go on your profile and filter your favorites by "incest" I get 15 very hardcore, explicit images? True facts. Hell, two of those images have what looks like a barely-legal, still almost flat-chested, pseudo-aged up humam Apple Bloom in them. Also, I wouldn't suggest removing them and claiming they weren't there to try and defend your hypocrisy. I've got screenshots. : )

Stones and glass houses, friend. Try to be more polite.
No reason given
Edited by Background Pony #3C75
Background Pony #3C75
[@sammykun](/images/3346978#comment_10888647)
It's less supporting incest and more hating people who endorce hate speech. Like you, apparently. If you actually read my comments, you'd see that I never defended incest once. The only thing even remotely close was saying I'd look into those artists out of spite.

Also, fun fact, are you aware that if I go on your profile and filter your favorites by "incest" I get 15 very hardcore, explicit images? True facts. Hell, two of those images have what looks like a barely-legal, still almost flat-chested, pseudo-aged up humam Apple Bloom in them. Also, I wouldnt suggest removing them and claiming they weren't there. I've got screenshots. : )

Stones and glass houses, friend. Try to be more polite.
No reason given
Edited by Background Pony #3C75
Background Pony #3C75
[@sammykun](/images/3346978#comment_10888647)
It's less supporting incest and more hating people who endorce hate speech. Like you, apparently. If you actually read my comments, you'd see that I never defended incest once. The only thing even remotely close was saying I'd look into those artists out of spite.

Also, fun fact, are you aware that if I go on your profile and filter your favorites by "incest" I get 15 very hardcore, explicit images? True facts. Hell, two of those images have what looks like a barely-legal, still almost flat-chested, pseudo-aged up humam Apple Bloom in them.

Stones and glass houses, friend. Try to be more polite.
No reason given
Edited by Background Pony #3C75
Background Pony #3C75
[@sammykun](/images/3346978#comment_10888647)
It's less supporting incest and more hating people who endorce hate speech. Like you, apparently. If you actually read my comments, you'd see that I never defended invcest once. The only thing even remotely close was saying I'd look into those artists out of spite.

Also, fun fact, are you aware that if I go on your profile and filter your favorites by "incest" I get 15 very hardcore, explicit images? True facts. Hell, two of those images have what looks like a barely-legal, still almost flat-chested, pseudo-aged up Apple Bloom in them.

Stones and glass houses, friend. Try to be more polite.
No reason given
Edited by Background Pony #3C75
Background Pony #3C75
[@sammykun](/images/3346978#comment_10888647)
It's less supporting incest and more hating people who endorce hate speech. Like you, apparently. If you actually read my comments, you'd see that I never defended invest once. The only thing even remotely close was saying I'd look into those artists out of spite.

Also, fun fact, are you aware that if I go on your profile and filter your favorites by "incest" I get 15 very hardcore, explicit images? True facts. Hell, two of those images have what looks like a barely-legal, still almost flat-chested, pseudo-aged up Apple Bloom in them.

Stones and glass houses, friend. Try to be more polite.
No reason given
Edited by Background Pony #3C75
Background Pony #3C75
[@sammykun](/images/3346978#comment_10888647)
It's less supporting incest and more hating people who endorce hate speech. Like you, apparently.

Also, fun fact, are you aware that if I go on your profile and filter your favorites by "incest" I get a 15 very hardcore, explicit images? True facts. Hell, two of those images have what looks like a barely-legal, still almost flat-chested, pseudo-aged up Apple Bloom in them.

Stones and glass houses, friend. Try to be more polite.
No reason given
Edited by Background Pony #3C75
Background Pony #3C75
[@sammykun](/images/3346978#comment_10888647)
It's less supporting incest and more hating people who endorce hate speech. Like you, apparently.

Also, fun fact, are you aware that if I go on your profile and filter your favorites by "incest" I get an 15 ventirey phage rdcof resu, explicit images? True facts. Hell, two of those images have what looks like a barely-legal, still almost flat-chested, pseudo-aged up Apple Bloom in them.

Stones and glass houses, friend. Try to be more polite.
No reason given
Edited by Background Pony #3C75
Background Pony #3C75
[@sammykun](/images/3346978#comment_10888647)
It's less supporting incest and more hating people who endorce hate speech. Like you, apparently.

Also, fun fact, are you aware that if I go on your profile and filter your favorites by "incest" I get an entire page of results? True facts. Hell, two of those images have what looks like a barely-legal, still almost flat-chested, pseudo-aged up Apple Bloom in them.

Stones and glass houses, friend. Try to be more polite.
No reason given
Edited by Background Pony #3C75
Background Pony #3C75
[@sammykun](/images/3346978#comment_10888647)
It's less supporting incest and more hating people who endorce hate speech. Like you, apparently.

Also, fun fact, are you aware that if I go on your profile and filter your favorites by "incest" I get an entire page of results? True facts.

Stones and glass houses, friend. Try to be more polite.
No reason given
Edited by Background Pony #3C75