@Background Pony #C99A
Sure. The shading is much less noticeable, as an example. Compare their hair. The way he used to texture his work just gave it so much more depth, or at least the illusion thereof. If you look at the older piece, some of the texture gives the appearance of faint stretch marks, intentional or not, which this newer piece lacks. My main criticism regarding anatomy covers her butt; it looks a little off to me, and that’s something else I think he did better back then. Their belly buttons are noticeably different, with the older having much more detail, and everything from the color of the lines there, to their thickness, makes a big difference.

Some of these are certainly justifiable style changes, and I’m just voicing my thoughts.

@Brothresgreen_
You don’t need to apologize. I’m just trying to give constructive criticism.

@Brothresgreen_
I don’t think you should listen to that “degeneration” comment, they might be riding their high horse a tad too high.

I apologize if the drawing was not what you expected, I try to polish my drawing style more every day, and I hope to improve more and more❤

@Background Pony #AC55
Can you be specific? I compared the two side by side and I noticed a slight change in style but I wouldn’t call it a degeneration of the style. As for anatomy, they don’t look that different unless you’re seeing something I’m not.

@Background Pony #07C1
I see a clear degeneration in both style and anatomy for this piece, when compared to that piece.

@Background Pony #AC55
That’s a bad thing?

Tnangerp?

I don’t mean to seem rude, but when I compare this to >>2935881 I see a clear degeneration in both style and anatomy.