Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Source
not provided yet
Policy Update - Rules changes incoming for AI content - Read Here
You’re better off than I.
Ah. Haven’t seen them, don’t particularly care.
Not this picture. For everything he’s done in his previous appearances.
For what? In this picture, at least, he’s not actually doing anything.
First you make a cut down the midsection (base of the neck to above penis {or vag}).
then you cut from hoof just before the hooves (where the fur gets more rigid) all the way back to the midsection cut (in a straight line).
Now you must cut around the hoof (where the cut to the mid section ends or begins {depending on perspective}), and the neck.
Then you cut off the male genetalia, And now make a cut around where the gentallia used to be, this cut goes around the genitals and above the dock then back down to meet the begining of the cut at the genetalia.
These steps gets you an outline of the hide (the part you will cut off).
Cut underneath the hide from the mid section untill you have a flap you can grip.
Now this is the harder part, if you possess some strength you can rip the hide off, and lift it don’t tug it.
Or (if you are a bit on the weaker side or a bit is too well held to lift off {usually around joints}) lift the hide until you can see the stretchy (flesh? skin?) stuff holding it then cut the stuff in a slicing motion.
This should take a couple of hours assuming you want hide that is usable, and don’t just plan to throw it out.
Thats how i remember doing it (with my uncle). Now i want to go back to pakiland just to do that again, it was kinda fun.
never thought about what skinning an animal entails. Thanks for enlightening me.
Maybe, and its good becuase a lot of fluffies die for 1 say jacket. Also according to abusers, their fur can be removed by anyone. Trust me removing hide off of an animal is hard, i went to pakiland when it was eid. They slaughter animals as sacrifices (its funny cos its primitive), i helped my uncle with a cow and it took 5 or 6 hours to get a badly removed hide.
The Cashman its stupid i know although funny.
Maybe, although you would have to kill MANY fluffies for much fur. Actually thats good, kill the invasives and their fur is really easy to remove.
the Cashman its funny although very stupid.
Great, now it’s got a point. While we’re at it, is fluffy fur useful for fur coats?
Maybe I’m thinking of brush fires. There’s something where the fires are a necessary part of keeping the land healthy, but I forget what it is. Anyhow, I’m just saying that the milking is nothing new. What’s oliver the gold man?
I sometimes refuse to believe Lindsay Lohan is a human.
Yes fluffies are edible, and according to certain headcanon they taste better abused, becuase (according to abusers) pain releases certain chemicals in their body. IRL this does happen, but most chemicals released don’t taste all that different from the normal flesh (if they taste like something at all). It could be a sugar of some sort in fluffies, that might explain why it tastes sweeter.
Wildfires usually damage the land permanently, the soil is damage and so on. Yea alot of shows where/are just 30 min toy commercials, hell MLP FiM is a 30 commercial, it just happens to be a good commercial you like watching. Like oliver the gold man.
A gorilla is probably smarter than Lindsay Lohan, so…
Anyhow, I’m still not necessarily in favor of animal abuse as a form of entertainment, even if there’s no real intelligence there, but I think we can compromise. Are fluffies edible? :)
As for Transformers, let’s be fair, it started out as a half-hour toy commercial. I’ve gotten to the point where I just accept the movies as being like a wildfire. It’s destructive and not necessarily pretty, but it’s the price the land pays so something new can grow.
Are they just milking transformers for what their worth at this point? Cos it seems 3 (Like back to the future)movies max can be good, and only 1 (transformer 1) was above average.
I’m not familiar with the whole backstory, but they seem to be of near-human intelligence. I’d be uncomfortable with needlessly killing gorillas for the same reason, though admittedly gorillas aren’t breeding out of control. As for being a nuisance that nobody cares for, there’s plenty of humans that qualify for that distinction, and bumping them off just because you feel like it tends to be frowned upon. Not saying it’s wrong, just saying I might not have it in me.
Transformers: 1 might have looked better to me because it came after the Unicron Trilogy shows, and 2 I might hate extra ’cause I blame it for Animated ending when it had another season in it. 3 was meh, 4 had its moments and is worth seeing once but could have been split into two movies instead of just being too damn long.
Under realistic situations: i would prefer a efficient eradication of fluffies (preferably painless). A animal not created through evolution must be thoroughly studied, and escaped samples without proper study are dangerous. In the fluffy verse (according to most) fluffies are just a nuisance and no one cares for them (legally). So of course people will kill them for kicks. Also are you not killing them, becuase they can talk? Thats a pretty shallow method of judgement.
Transformers: I felt like it was the same action drivel that hollywood loves. Theres nothing new, and nothing amazingly implemented to stand out. I haven’t seen the fourth one, but 1 was acceptable (hell i would re watch it), 2 was shit and 3 was marginally above shit.
Still, I’m just a little iffy on mass-murdering anything that can talk unless they’re actively attacking people. Killing off the ones that become a problem is different, but I still say relocating the swarm to places humans can’t use, like Centralia, to live or die (probably die) on their own is less likely to get certain people up in arms, and since it has the benfit of being “humane”, it’ll make it easier to remove the pet ones while we’re at it.
As for the Transformers movies, the first one, to me, was okay, though there’s definitely parts of it I could have lived without. Second was a train wreck, third was better than second but still disappointing, fourth is closer to the mark but they still don’t seem to quite get what makes Transformers Transformers.
It wasn’t sarcasm. Just a nigh-baseless speculation.
If thats sarcasm then your right, if its not then i don’t.
You have a great sense of media.
No the bay movies, transformers in general are a cool concept.
Are you just talking about the Michael Bay movies or Transformers in general?
Not unless they are severely mentally disabled.
None of the transformers really seemed all that original to me. Not that only original ideas are good, but no “cliche” was even applied well.
Yeah, this movie was at least a step in that direction, the Transformers got more screen time than they had in the past movies, even if it did take a bit too long to get to them.
It’s a small step. Perhaps the next movie will actually focus on the Transformers instead of the humans. Doubtful it will, but I’ll gonna pretend that it might.
It’s like they’re trying to miss the point. Not that I’m defending “Age of Extinction”, but still, they at least finally realized that Optimus Prime was more important than Megan Fox’s butt.