Ihhh 
"[@Darth Sonic":](/1498965#comment_6378502
)
First off, You're singling out one instance of bad 3d animation while ignoring the rest of the animation showcased in the trailer. Secondly, I am almost certain that the cgi was done in a separate 3d program, and not in toon boom, a 2d program, so how does bad cgi have anything to do with how toon boom is being used when toon boom is not being used for cgi? Your initial comment claimed that these shorts showcased a better use of the software then the movie did (never mind that there is no confirmation that these shorts were even produced with it), and yet the example you used as evidence has nothing to do with that.
[@Darth Sonic](/1498965#comment_6378539)
Most trailers for CGI heavy movies feature unfinished CGI, and the shots containing unfinished cgi are often necessary to the continuity of the scene being presented. Regardless, most people don't care if one instance of cgi looks bad as long as the rest of the trailer looks fine, so why should a trailer house exclude a shot just to placate a few nitpickers? It's not as if a single instance of unfinished cgi in a trailer would result in a significant loss of potential ticket sales.
<<<<<
First off, You're singling out one instance of bad 3d animation while ignoring the rest of the animation showcased in the trailer. Secondly, I am almost certain that the cgi was done in a separate 3d program, and not in toon boom, a 2d program, so how does bad cgi have anything to do with how toon boom is being used when toon boom is not being used for cgi? Your initial comment claimed that these shorts showcased a better use of the software then the movie did (never mind that there is no confirmation that these shorts were even produced with it), and yet the example you used as evidence has nothing to do with that.
[@Darth Sonic](/1498965#comment_6378539)
Most trailers for CGI heavy movies feature unfinished CGI, and the shots containing unfinished cgi are often necessary to the continuity of the scene being presented. Regardless, most people don't care if one instance of cgi looks bad as long as the rest of the trailer looks fine, so why should a trailer house exclude a shot just to placate a few nitpickers? It's not as if a single instance of unfinished cgi in a trailer would result in a significant loss of potential ticket sales.