Uploaded by Badumsquish
3500x2189 PNG 642 kBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
There is only one Master Ball in existence. Make sure you use it wisely :P
Tags
+-SH safe2275690 +-SH artist:badumsquish2561 +-SH derpibooru exclusive43830 +-SH derpy hooves59553 +-SH pegasus540521 +-SH pony1709146 +-SH g42133635 +-SH :o7017 +-SH bush5077 +-SH confused7087 +-SH discussion in the comments843 +-SH female1917976 +-SH high res413428 +-SH looking back95314 +-SH mare811972 +-SH master ball35 +-SH motion blur762 +-SH offscreen character57638 +-SH open mouth258592 +-SH poké ball797 +-SH pokémon11526 +-SH raised hoof76575 +-SH show accurate28367 +-SH sitting100697 +-SH solo1511643 +-SH spread wings106672 +-SH throwing766 +-SH wings252346
Source
not provided yet
Loading...
Loading...
It’s more or less why I like to compare ponies like Lightning Dust and Trixie to the Mane Six. Like, it’s fine to say they did shitty stuff, because they did, but like people like to act like Lightning Dust was the only baddie in Wonderbolts Academy when Rainbow Dash did everything Lightning Dust did, and Spitfire encouraged it every step of the way, and then try and justify why it’s wrong for Lightning Dust to do it but okay for Rainbow Dash to do it :P
It’s so funny that we’ve delved into the point where any morally ambiguous actions from the main characters are basically always painted as either pure evil or absolutely horrible that I start questioning whether or not I should be a fan anymore, but honestly I’m used to it at this point. The show is over anyway and I don’t care anymore.
It’s not like it’s bad writing or anything. Like, it’s totally in-line with their personalities. Dashie’s defined more than anything else by her arrogance and her loyalty to her friends. Of course she’d 100% blame Lightning Dust for anything that happened between them and confidently genuinely believe she was innocent. Same with the rest of the Mane Six, who have always treated any wrongdoing on their part in one of two ways: either they’re like “Oh we did wrong but we learned from it so it’s not wrong anymore” or they blame someone else for it. It makes perfect sense they’d genuinely believe they didn’t have any culpability in any of those incidents :P
Goddammit I ran out of arguments. This is why I only have Fluttershy as my favorite. Nothing is sacred but her. Always go for Fluttershy~
I’ve always had a “so fucking what?” attitude for most excuses. It’s one thing when it’s an act of desperation or spontaneity, but a lot of them are just like “I was wronged so now it’s okay to ruin as many lives as humanly possible.” Like, ever watch Addams Family Values, with Debbie and the MALIBU BARBIE that she wanted? A lot of “sympathetic” baddies in shows are exactly like her, except we’re actually expected to feel bad for them :P
It really depends on one’s attitude after redemption. As much as I support killing to stop the worst of the worst, everyone still deserves at least one second chance, especially when they cherish that second chance. Things like mental illnesses, impulses, or basic poor judgements exist. It’s how they feel about those things that matters to me, like yeah they did shitty things but then they feel tremendously regretful of them and actually never do it again. Take Lightning Dust for example again, she is the one character everyone thinks deserves a second chance despite her reckless actions and she only admits wrong very slightly instead of a full remorse. I actually would love for a redemption arc for her where she learns to value lives more. It seems possible since she is known for not holding grudges and hatching schemes. I’m not saying she shouldn’t come back or should be left behind, but that her actions should be acknowledged as being reckless. Still, if we’re so willing to redeem her, why can’t the same be applied to all the others? It’s a cliche saying but I do believe everyone deserves a second chance. Yes, people suffered because of them but that’s in the past and that can’t be changed anymore. What really matters for me is if they still hurt people in the present.
@Background Pony #7314
A big thing for me is when people don’t deserve the redemption. You get to the point where you don’t care that they genuinely have changed or have regretted their actions – they flat-out don’t deserve a happy life because they stole happiness and life from so many other innocent people. People always fret about the villain themselves, never about the people who’s lives were ruined by them. Especially when characters do that whole psychopathy-type “redemption” where they’re only curbing their behavior because they’re benefiting from not doing that behavior anymore: they haven’t changed, they’re just being given what they want to not be evil anymore. So they’re not “relapsing” but are merely seeing opportunities where it would benefit them more to do wrong than to do good. Like, Zuko was always villainous, but he was never a bad person. Even at his worst he was a noble person, he had a strong sense of right and wrong and would choose always choose right unless he had no other option, and hell even his introductory has him use non-lethal force to take down Sokka: he could have roasted Sokka alive for attacking him and nobody could have stopped him, but he chose to take him down with hand-to-hand tactics instead, and he could have told Aang he’d go back and murder the water tribe if Aang ever escaped but he didn’t :P
this is true yeh, plus he never was that bad in first place
Yes but Zuko eventually sticks to the right side and never tries anything funny anymore. It would have been heartbreaking if he suddenly attacks Katara during the Agni Kai against Azula or secretly return to his father to tell him Team Avatar’s plan. He sticks to Aang and his friends until the end and never turns back again.
relapsing doesn’t mean someones redemption is pointless, people make mistakes. think of zuko for example he made hundreds of mistakes before he finally got it right. realistic redemptions at least.
I actually like the pure evil kinds that just don’t care if whatever they do is right, those that don’t talk about a bunch of crap and do whatever the hell they want. Sometimes a bad guy would be like “This world is imperfect so I have to cause chaos to teach them a lesson. You would never understand as only I can see the truth blah blah blah.” like shut up you’re doing awful things. Just ben honest, admit to it, and probably have fun until the plot stops you or something. It’s honestly way worse if they try to make their actions make sense when someone else probably has the same experience but they’re the one that chooses to cause harm to achieve their goal. There are thousands of ways to make something happen. Why are they allowed to do specifically that way? On the topic of regret. It depends on their later actions for me. Any kind of reformation is taking a risk, no matter when and why it happens. Maybe sometimes they just grew a conscience or they hated doing evil things to begin with but thought it’s their only option. Whatever the case, their regret is eventually believable when afterward they actually change their attitude and stop doing what they did. It’s more about “change”. If a character just relapses occasionally or still has a horrible attitude after some time has passed, the redemption is basically pointless. It’s more about trust and then forgiveness comes after trust. It’s not about sympathy either. It’s just about chance, and if they don’t value that chance, maybe they shouldn’t be sympathized at all. (Oh and the Obi Wan series is out already? That’s something new.)
Don’t get me wrong, I like most kind of villains, but I always liked the ones who make logical, goal-oriented decisions rather than just being evil for the sake of it. Quite honestly the ONLY villain I don’t like are the ones who do evil, dumb shit, and then suddenly regret it, and suddenly we’re supposed to pretend they’re actually a good person and sympathize with them. Spoiler for Obi Wan: Like Reva: she’s murdered hundreds on a petty revenge scheme, and suddenly we’re supposed to cheer her on for “finding her new way in life” because she ultimately spared Luke after savagely beating his parents? :P
I don’t know. I kind of just like villains for the sake of being villains. I don’t really care what motive they have, like I hate to use anything to justify what they do, backstory, motive, tragedy etc. I think it’s better to just acknowledge their actions as bad. Even with Team Rocket I would say they don’t exactly have the best track record. I just like their charms. I also just like the freedom they show that we can’t have in real life. I just love watching them do evil things, be awful, and have fun. They’re all fake anyway and it’s not like I’m gonna follow their example. For me it’s like “What they do is bad but it looks like fun. I wish I could have this much fun but I know it’s not good.” It doesn’t really matter to me what their motive and whatever else is. I just want to see evil people be evil.
@Background Pony #B977
Yeah. I always liked the villains the best who actually have a reasonable motive behind their actions. I don’t mean reasonable as in right or wrong either, but reasonable as in it’s a pretty reasonable means of getting what they want. So like Iron Will, Trixie, and Lightning Dust are all three of the strongest villains the show has ever produced in that regard: they don’t do wrong to be jerks or because it’s fun (though they may enjoy some of it), but they do wrong and are jerks because it’s working toward a specific goal. Especially Lightning Dust, like she was amazing with all that. She didn’t plot, she didn’t scheme, she didn’t make a big revenge scheme against Rainbow Dash or stalk her or try to sabotage her Wonderbolts career: she basically said “I want to lead a team of stunt flyers. There are a number of good potential stunt flyers looking for jobs after being booted from the Wonderbolts. I’m going to start a team, hire them, and we’ll all be stunt flyers with me being team leader.” Rainbow Dash was such a small blip on her radar by the time they re-encountered each other that her screwing with Dash was just an opportunistic “Oh yeah, you and your friends screwed me over so I’m going to get a little payback because I can” kind of an affair :P
Just make a character who has believable goals and is willing to do bad things to make it happen :P
True, if they’re fun enough and done right, villains can be fun, but at the same time, villains may do things that we as an audience would find utterly reprehensible and would want to see them taken down by the heroes.
Yeah, villains are so much more fun to watch. I don’t understand why people think villain is like a horrible label when it’s just a much cooler character. :P
I think villains are more interesting than heroes in most shows. Because like there have to be rules with protagonists, like there are things they can or can’t do. Villains can basically do whatever they want, since we expect them to be bad XD
Yeah, the Team Rocket Trio has more or less become the show’s main characters too. They would get their own central episodes, their own heartfelt moment, each of them individually no less, and their own theme songs. It’s that despite being villains, they care about Pokemon and each other just as much as the heroes and they’re basically just around to add conflict to an otherwise dull adventure. They’re the heroes of their own story and probably beyond fan favorite at this point. :P
It’s ironic too since they’re so much more developed than the characters. Like, Ash just wants to capture pokemon because “be the best” or something, Misty originally wanted her bike replaced but sort of just forgot about it, and Brock was there because there was nothing good on TV that day I guess, and none of them really have backstories. Then Team Rocket have like fully fleshed out backstories, sympathetic plights, and deep characterizations XD
@Wayneponeth
There must be at least one jerk-off in that world who jailbroke his pokeball to catch anything and then like hurled it at someone who was talking during a movie or something XD
It doesn’t work on humans anyway as far as we know. Green throws a ball at your character and it did nothing. It definitely doesn’t work on human in the anime. The rice ball/onigiri (screw you 4kids) moment actually makes sense since you seem to pick up items from Pokeballs in the games. I can’t be sure if it works on creatures other than Pokemon though, since no other creature ever appeared in the Pokemon universe and sadly crossovers like Super Smash Bros never used the opportunity to explore that possibility.
Yeah, a part of it may be true. Because they all have such terrible lives (Jessie was too poor and failed
Chanseynurse school. James is forced to marry a psychopath despite being a billionaire. Meowth learned to speak human to win over a female Meowth only for her to go after a Persian.), they’d rather stay Team Rocket forever together. They genuinely care for each other and they always reunite every time no matter how many times they disband. They probably intentionally get defeat by Ash and the gang just so they can enjoy the freedom of doing whatever they want instead of being bossed around in the headquarter. They even actually help their enemies sometimes out of kindness and morality. :P