Viewing last 25 versions of comment by Bandwidth on image #2686217

[@Wayneponeth](/images/2686217#comment_9996433)
Reread your last comment. You literally put "@Bandwidth" and then said "I just wanted you, and the other commenter, to not spread false information." So either you meant me or made a typo. Either way, I'm not defensive about my rumor, I want you to know what you're saying and it means since it seems to contradict your point and you may or may not realize it. My point stands still. You claim I'm "spreading misinformation" because other might read my comment as fact when I clearly stated it is implied which would leave it out of our control if someone at that point skims over the "possibility" and "implies". Implications are never facts, so there is no reason to claim I'm spreading misinformation as it being a possibility.

That's like telling me I'm spreading misinformation saying that a two sided coin will possibly land on heads.

The point of my take on the topic (not rumor), is that it's more likely a possibility based on the variables at hand: a) her leaving after EG was created b) if what you say is true that she left for "creative differences" could include one of her reasons (emphasis on one of them) being about leaving because of EG. Because remember that she doesn't HAVE to disclose more than she needs to which makes it possible. It is more likely, take it or leave it. I never claimed it to be true and it is not misinformation since it is simply possibility supported by the situation.

I would suggest learning more on how to socialize with others before using words you don't understand to make a point that is defensively exaggerated. There was never misinformation and an opinion is not a rumor. A rumor is a story made up, claiming to be true. Neither of which I did. Again, my opinion is based on the variables and could be considered an inference based on observation. An inference is not a definitive fact but merely possibility until proven true or false.

Regardless of how you feel about the matter, what is fact is my OPINION is an inference based on observation and is supported as POSSIBLE and more likely since it has more variables at hand supporting it besides yours. Whether who is right or wrong does not matter to me, besides in the end it doesn't change our lives, what matters to me is that I tell you that your accusations towards me are false and greatly misconstrued and that I hope to god I made some impact on your bad judgement towards my true intentions.

[@Wayneponeth](/images/2686217#comment_9996433)
Reread your last comment. You literally put "@Bandwidth" and then said "I just wanted you, and the other commenter, to not spread false information." So either you meant me or made a typo. Either way, I'm not defensive about my rumor, I want you to know what you're saying and it means since it seems to contradict your point and you may or may not realize it. My point stands still. You claim I'm "spreading misinformation" because other might read my comment as fact when I clearly stated it is implied which would leave it out of our control if someone at that point skims over the "possibility" and "implies". Implications are never facts, so there is no reason to claim I'm spreading misinformation as it being a possibility.

That's like telling me I'm spreading misinformation saying that a two sided coin will possibly land on heads.

The point of my take on the topic (not rumor), is that it's more likely a possibility based on the variables at hand: a) her leaving after EG was created b) if what you say is true that she left for "creative differences" could include one of her reasons (emphasis on one of them) being about leaving because of EG. Because remember that she doesn't HAVE to disclose more than she needs to which makes it possible. It is more likely, take it or leave it. I never claimed it to be true and it is not misinformation since it is simply possibility supported by the situation.

I would suggest learning more on how to socialize with others before using words you don't understand to make a point that is defensively exaggerated. There was never misinformation and an opinion is not a rumor. A rumor is a story made up, claiming to be true. Neither of which I did. Again, my opinion is based on the variables and could be considered an inference based on observation. An inference is not a definitive fact but merely possibility until proven true or false.

Regardless of how you feel about the matter, what is fact is my OPINION is an inference based on observation and is supported as POSSIBLE and more likely basinced onit has more variables at hand supporting it besides yours. Whether who is right or wrong does not matter to me, besides in the end it doesn't change our live, what matters is that I tell you that your accusations towards me are false and greatly misconstrued and that I hope to god I made some impact on your bad judgement towards my true intentions.

[@Wayneponeth](/images/2686217#comment_9996433)
Reread your last comment. You literally put "@Bandwidth" and then said "I just wanted you, and the other commenter, to not spread false information." So either you meant me or made a typo. Either way, I'm not defensive about my rumor, I want you to know what you're saying and it means since it seems to contradict your point and you may or may not realize it. My point stands still. You claim I'm "spreading misinformation" because other might read my comment as fact when I clearly stated it is implied which would leave it out of our control if someone at that point skims over the "possibility" and "implies". Implications are never facts, so there is no reason to claim I'm spreading misinformation as it being a possibility.

That's like telling me I'm spreading misinformation saying that a two sided coin will possibly land on heads.

The point of my take on the topic (not rumor), is that it's more likely a possibility based on the variables at hand: a) her leaving after EG was created b) if what you say is true that she left for "creative differences" could include one of her reasons (emphasis on one of them) being about leaving because of EG. Because remember that she doesn't HAVE to disclose more than she needs to which makes it possible. It is more likely, take it or leave it. I never claimed it to be true and it is not misinformation since it is simply possibility supported by the situation.

I would suggest learning more on how to socialize with others before using words you don't understand to make a point that is defensively exaggerated. There was never misinformation and an opinion is not a rumor. A rumor is a story made up, claiming to be true. Neither of which I did. Again, my opinion is based on the variables and could be considered an inference based on observation. An inference is not a definitive fact but merely possibility until proven true or false.

Regardless of how you feel about the matter, what is fact is my OPINION is an inferenced based on observation and is supported as POSSIBLE and more likely based on more variables at hand supporting it besides yours. Whether who is right or wrong does not matter to me, besides in the end it doesn't change our live, what matters is that I tell you that your accusations towards me are false and greatly misconstrued and that I hope to god I made some impact on your bad judgement towards my true intentions.

[@Wayneponeth](/images/2686217#comment_9996433)
Reread your last comment. You literally put "@Bandwidth" and then said "I just wanted you, and the other commenter, to not spread false information." So either you meant me or made a typo. Either way, I'm not defensive about my rumor, I want you to know what you're saying and it means since it seems to contradict your point and you may or may not realize it. My point stands still. You claim I'm "spreading misinformation" because other might read my comment as fact when I clearly stated it is implied which would leave it out of our control if someone at that point skims over the "possibility" and "implies". Implications are never facts, so there is no reason to claim I'm spreading misinformation as it being a possibility.

That's like telling me I'm spreading misinformation saying that a two sided coin will possibly land on heads.

The point of my take on the topic (not rumor), is that it's more likely a possibility based on the variables at hand: a) her leaving after EG was created b) if what you say is true that she left for "creative differences" could include one of her reasons (emphasis on one of them) being about leaving because of EG. Because remember that she doesn't HAVE to disclose more than she needs to which makes it possible. It is more likely, take it or leave it. I never claimed it to be true and it is not misinformation since it is simply possibility supported by the situation.

I would suggest learning more on how to socialize with others before using words you don't understand to make a point that is defensively exaggerated. There was never misinformation and an opinion is not a rumor. A rumor is a story made up, claiming to be true. Neither of which I did. Again, my opinion is based on the variables and could be considered an inference based on observation. An inference is not a definitive fact but merely possibility until proven true or false.

Regardless of how you feel about the matter, what is fact is my OPINION is an inferenced based on observation and is supported as POSSIBLE and more likely based on more variables at hand supporting it besides yours. Whether who is right or wrong does not matter to me., Wbesides in the end it doesn't change our live, what matters is that I tell you that your accusations towards me are false and greatly misconstrued and that I hope to god I made some impact on your bad judgement towards my true intentions.

[@Wayneponeth](/images/2686217#comment_9996433)
Reread your last comment. You literally put "@Bandwidth" and then said "I just wanted you, and the other commenter, to not spread false information." So either you meant me or made a typo. Either way, I'm not defensive about my rumor, I want you to know what you're saying and it means since it seems to contradict your point and you may or may not realize it. My point stands still. You claim I'm "spreading misinformation" because other might read my comment as fact when I clearly stated it is implied which would leave it out of our control if someone at that point skims over the "possibility" and "implies". Implications are never facts, so there is no reason to claim I'm spreading misinformation as it being a possibility.

That's like telling me I'm spreading misinformation saying that a two sided coin will possibly land on heads.

The point of my take on the topic (not rumor), is that it's more likely a possibility based on the variables at hand: a) her leaving after EG was created b) if what you say is true that she left for "creative differences" could include one of her reasons (emphasis on one of them) being about leaving because of EG. Because remember that she doesn't HAVE to disclose more than she needs to which makes it possible. It is more likely, take it or leave it. I never claimed it to be true and it is not misinformation since it is simply possibility supported by the situation.

I would suggest learning more on how to socialize with others before using words you don't understand to make a point that is defensively exaggerated. There was never misinformation and an opinion is not a rumor. A rumor is a story made up, claiming to be true. Neither of which I did. Again, my opinion is based on the variables and could be considered an inference based on observation. An inference is not a definitive fact but merely possibility until proven true or false.

Regardless of how you feel about the matter, THATwhat is fact. Mis my opOPINION is an ionferenced ibased myon opbservatinion and is supported as POSSIBLE and more likely based on more variables at hand supporting it besides yours. Whether who is right or wrong does not matter to me. What matters is that I tell you that your accusations towards me are false and greatly misconstrued.

[@Wayneponeth](/images/2686217#comment_9996433)
Reread your last comment. You literally put "@Bandwidth" and then said "I just wanted you, and the other commenter, to not spread false information." So either you meant me or made a typo. Either way, I'm not defensive about my rumor, I want you to know what you're saying and it means since it seems to contradict your point and you may or may not realize it. My point stands still. You claim I'm "spreading misinformation" because other might read my comment as fact when I clearly stated it is implied which would leave it out of our control if someone at that point skims over the "possibility" and "implies". Implications are never facts, so there is no reason to claim I'm spreading misinformation as it being a possibility.

That's like telling me I'm spreading misinformation saying that a two sided coin will possibly land on heads.

The point of my take on the topic (not rumor), is that it's more likely a possibility based on the variables at hand: a) her leaving after EG was created b) if what you say is true that she left for "creative differences" could include one of her reasons (emphasis on one of them) being about leaving because of EG. Because remember that she doesn't HAVE to disclose more than she needs to which makes it possible. It is more likely, take it or leave it. I never claimed it to be true and it is not misinformation since it is simply possibility supported by the situation.

I would suggest learning more on how to socialize with others before using words you don't understand to make a point that is defensively exaggerated. There was never misinformation and an opinion is not a rumor. A rumor is a story made up, claiming to be true. Neither of which I did. Again, my opinion is based on the variables and could be considered an inference based on observation. An inference is not a definitive fact but merely possibility until proven true or false.

Regardless of how you feel about the matter, THAT is fact. My opinion is my opinion and is supported as POSSIBLE and more likely based on more variables at hand supporting it besides yours. Whether who is right or wrong does not matter to me. What matters is that I tell you that your accusations towards me are false and greatly misconstrued.

[@Wayneponeth](/images/2686217#comment_9996433)
Reread your last comment. You literally put "@Bandwidth" and then said "I just wanted you, and the other commenter, to not spread false information." So either you meant me or made a typo. Either way, I'm not defensive about my rumor, I want you to know what you're saying and it means since it seems to contradict your point and you may or may not realize it. My point stands still. You claim I'm "spreading misinformation" because other might read my comment as fact when I clearly stated it is implied which would leave it out of our control if someone at that point skims over the "possibility" and "implies". Implications are never facts, so there is no reason to claim I'm spreading misinformation as it being a possibility.

That's like telling me I'm spreading misinformation saying that a two sided coin will possibly land on heads.

The point of my take on the topic (not rumor), is that it's more likely a possibility based on the variables at hand: a) her leaving after EG was created b) if what you say is true that she left for "creative differences" could include one of her reasons (emphasis on one of them) being about leaving because of EG. Because remember that she doesn't HAVE to disclose more than she needs to which makes it possible. It is more likely, take it or leave it. I never claimed it to be true and it is not misinformation since it is simply possibility supported by the situation.

I would suggest learning more on how to socialize with others before using words you don't understand to make a point that is defensively exaggerated. There was never misinformation and an opinion is not a rumor. A rumor is a story made up, claiming to be true. Neither of which I did. Again, my opinion is based on the variables and could be considered an inference based on observation. An inference is not a definitive fact but merely possibility until proven true or false.

[@Wayneponeth](/images/2686217#comment_9996433)
Reread your last comment. You literally put "@Bandwidth" and then said "I just wanted you, and the other commenter, to not spread false information." So either you meant me or made a typo. Either way, I'm not defensive about my rumor, I want you to know what you're saying and it means since it seems to contradict your point and you may or may not realize it. My point stands still. You claim I'm "spreading misinformation" because other might read my comment as fact when I clearly stated it is implied which would leave it out of our control if someone at that point skims over the "possibility" and "implies". Implications are never facts, so there is no reason to claim I'm spreading misinformation as it being a possibility.

That's like telling me I'm spreading misinformation saying that a two sided coin will possibly land on heads.

The point of my take on the topic (not rumor), is that it's more likely a possibility based on the variables at hand: a) her leaving after EG was created b) if what you say is true that she left for "creative differences" could include one of her reasons (emphasis on one of them) being about leaving because of EG. It is more likely, take it or leave it. I never claimed it to be true and it is not misinformation since it is simply possibility supported by the situation.

I would suggest learning more on how to socialize with others before using words you don't understand to make a point that is defensively exaggerated. There was never misinformation and an opinion is not a rumor. A rumor is a story made up, claiming to be true. Neither of which I did. Again, my opinion is based on the variables and could be considered an inference based on observation. An inference is not a definitive fact but merely possibility until proven true or false.

[@Wayneponeth](/images/2686217#comment_9996433)
Reread your last comment. You literally put "@Bandwidth" and then said "I just wanted you, and the other commenter, to not spread false information." So either you meant me or made a typo. Either way, I'm defensive about my rumor, I want you to know what you're saying and it means since it seems to contradict your point and you may or may not realize it. My point stands still. You claim I'm "spreading misinformation" because other might read my comment as fact when I clearly stated it is implied which would leave it out of our control if someone at that point skims over the "possibility" and "implies". Implications are never facts, so there is no reason to claim I'm spreading misinformation as it being a possibility.

That's like telling me I'm spreading misinformation saying that a two sided coin will possibly land on heads.

The point of my take on the topic (not rumor), is that it's more likely a possibility based on the variables at hand: a) her leaving after EG was created b) if what you say is true that she left for "creative differences" could include one of her reasons (emphasis on one of them) being about leaving because of EG. It is more likely, take it or leave it. I never claimed it to be true and it is not misinformation since it is simply possibility supported by the situation.

I would suggest learning more on how to socialize with others before using words you don't understand to make a point that is defensively exaggerated. There was never misinformation and an opinion is not a rumor. A rumor is a story made up, claiming to be true. Neither of which I did. Again, my opinion is based on the variables and could be considered an inference based on observation. An inference is not a definitive fact but merely possibility until proven true or false .

[@Wayneponeth](/images/2686217#comment_9996433)
Reread your last comment. You literally put "@Bandwidth" and then said "I just wanted you, and the other commenter, to not spread false information." So either you meant me or made a typo. Either way, I'm defensive about my rumor, I want you to know what you're saying and it means since it seems to contradict your point and you may or may not realize it. My point stands still. You claim I'm "spreading misinformation" because other might read my comment as fact when I clearly stated it is implied which would leave it out of our control if someone at that point skims over the "possibility" and "implies". Implications are never facts, so there is no reason to claim I'm spreading misinformation as it being a possibility.

That's like telling me I'm spreading misinformation saying that a two sided coin will possibly land on heads.

The point of my take on the topic (not rumor), is that it's more likely a possibility based on the variables at hand: a) her leaving after EG was created b) if what you say is true that she left for "creative differences" could include one of her reasons (emphasis on one of them) being about leaving because of EG. It is more likely, take it or leave it. I never claimed it to be true and it is not misinformation since it is simply possibility supported by the situation.

I would suggest learning more on how to socialize with others before using words you don't understand to make a point that is defensively exaggerated. There was never misinformation and an opinion is not a rumor. A rumor is a story made up, and claimeding to be true. Neither of which I did. Again, my opinion is based on the variables and could be considered an inference based on observation. An inference is not a definitive fact but merely possibility until proven true or false

[@Wayneponeth](/images/2686217#comment_9996433)
Reread your last comment. You literally put "@Bandwidth" and then said "I just wanted you, and the other commenter, to not spread false information." So either you meant me or made a typo. Either way, I'm defensive about my rumor, I want you to know what you're saying and it means since it seems to contradict your point and you may or may not realize it. My point stands still. You claim I'm "spreading misinformation" because other might read my comment as fact when I clearly stated it is implied which would leave it out of our control if someone at that point skims over the "possibility" and "implies". Implications are never facts, so there is no reason to claim I'm spreading misinformation as it being a possibility.

That's like telling me I'm spreading misinformation saying that a two sided coin will possibly land on heads.

The point of my take on the topic (not rumor), is that it's more likely a possibility based on the variables at hand: a) her leaving after EG was created b) if what you say is true that she left for "creative differences" could include one of her reasons (emphasis on one of them) being about leaving because of EG. It is more likely, take it or leave it. I never claimed it to be true and it is not misinformation since it is simply possibility supported by the situation.

I would suggest learning more on how to socialize with others before using words you don't understand to make a point that is defensively exaggerated. There was never misinformation and an opinion is not a rumor. A rumor is a story made up and claimed to be true. Neither of which I did.

[@Wayneponeth](/images/2686217#comment_9996433)
Reread your last comment. You literally put "@Bandwidth" and then said "I just wanted you, and the other commenter, to not spread false information." So either you meant me or made a typo. Either way, I'm defensive about my rumor, I want you to know what you're saying and it means since it seems to contradict your point and you may or may not realize it. My point stands still. You claim I'm "spreading misinformation" because other might read my comment as fact when I clearly stated it is implied which would leave it out of our control if someone at that point skims over the "possibility" and "implies". Implications are never facts, so there is no reason to claim I'm spreading misinformation as it being a possibility.

That's like telling me I'm spreading misinformation saying that a two sided coin will possibly land on heads.

The point of my take on the topic (not rumor), is that it's more likely a possibility based on the variables at hand: a) her leaving after EG was created b) if what you say is true that she left for "creative differences" could include one of her reasons (emphasis on one of them) being about leaving because of EG. It is more likely, take it or leave it. I never claimed it to be true and it is not misinformation since it is simply possibility supported by the situation.

I would suggest learning more on how to socialize with others before using words you don't understand to make a point that is defensively exaggerated. There was never misinformation and an opinion is not a rumor. A rumor is a story made up and claimed to be true. Neither of which I did.

[@Wayneponeth](/images/2686217#comment_9996433)
Reread your last comment. You literally put "@Bandwidth" and then said "I just wanted you, and the other commenter, to not spread false information." So either you meant me or made a typo. Either way, I'm defensive about my rumor, I want you to know what you're saying and it means since it seems to contradict your point and you may or may not realize it. My point stands still. You claim I'm "spreading misinformation" because other might read my comment as fact when I clearly stated it is implied which would leave it out of our control if someone at that point skims over the "possibility" and "implies". Implications are never facts, so there is no reason to claim I'm spreading misinformation as it being a possibility.

That's like telling me I'm spreading misinformation saying that a two sided coin will possibly land on heads.

The point of my take on the topic (not rumor), is that it's more likely a possibility based on the variables at hand: a) her leaving after EG was created b) if what you say is true that she left for "creative differences" could include one of her reasons (emphasis on one of them) being about leaving because of EG. It is more likely, take it or leave it. I never claimed it to be true and it is not misinformation since it is simply possibility supported by the situation.

I would suggest learning more on how to socialize with others before using words you don't understand to make a point that is odefensiverly exaggerated. There was never misinformation and an opinion is not a rumor.

[@Wayneponeth](/images/2686217#comment_9996433)
Reread your last comment. You literally put "@Bandwidth" and then said "I just wanted you, and the other commenter, to not spread false information." So either you meant me or made a typo. Either way, I'm defensive about my rumor, I want you to know what you're saying and it means since it seems to contradict your point and you may or may not realize it. My point stands still. You claim I'm "spreading misinformation" because other might read my comment as fact when I clearly stated it is implied which would leave it out of our control if someone at that point skims over the "possibility" and "implies". Implications are never facts, so there is no reason to claim I'm spreading misinformation as it being a possibility.

That's like telling me I'm spreading misinformation saying that a two sided coin will possibly land on heads.

The point of my take on the topic (not rumor), is that it's more likely a possibility based on the variables at hand: a) her leaving after EG was created b) if what you say is true that she left for "creative differences" could include one of her reasons (emphasis on one of them) being about leaving because of EG. It is more likely, take it or leave it. I never claimed it to be true and it is not misinformation since it is simply possibility supported by the situation.

I would suggest learning more on how to socialize more with peoplthers before using big words you don't understand to make a point that is overly exaggerated.

[@Wayneponeth](/images/2686217#comment_9996433)
Reread your last comment. You literally put "@Bandwidth" and then said "I just wanted you, and the other commenter, to not spread false information." So either you meant me or made a typo. Either way, I'm defensive about my rumor, I want you to know what you're saying and it means since it seems to contradict your point and you may or may not realize it. My point stands still. You claim I'm "spreading misinformation" because other might read my comment as fact when I clearly stated it is implied which would leave it out of our control if someone at that point skims over the "possibility" and "implies". Implications are never facts, so there is no reason to claim I'm spreading misinformation as it being a possibility.

That's like telling me I'm spreading misinformation saying that a two sided coin will possibly land on heads.

The point of my take on the topic (not rumor), is that it's more likely a possibility based on the variables at hand: a) her leaving after EG was created b) if what you say is true that she left for "creative differences" could include one of her reasons (emphasis on one of them) being about leaving because of EG. It is more likely, take it or leave it. I never claimed it to be true and it is not misinformation since it is simply possibility supported by the situation.

I would suggest learning how to socialize more with people before using big words you don't understand.

[@Wayneponeth](/images/2686217#comment_9996433)
Reread your last comment. You literally put "@Bandwidth" and then said "I just wanted you, and the other commenter, to not spread false information." So either you meant me or made a typo. Either way, I'm defensive about my rumor, I want you to know what you're saying and it means since it seems to contradict your point and you may or may not realize it. My point stands still. You claim I'm "spreading misinformation" because other might read my comment as fact when I clearly stated it is implied which would leave it out of our control if someone at that point skims over the "possibility" and "implies". Implications are never facts, so there is no reason to claim I'm spreading misinformation as it being a possibility.

That's like telling me I'm spreading misinformation saying that a two sided coin will possibly land on heads.

[@Wayneponeth](/images/2686217#comment_9996433)
Reread your last comment. You literally put "@Bandwidth" and then said "I just wanted you, and the other commenter, to not spread false information." So either you meant me or made a typo. Either way, I'm defensive about my rumor, I want you to know what you're saying and it means since it seems to contradict your point and you may or may not realize it. My point stands still. You claim I'm "spreading misinformation" because other might read my comment as fact when I clearly stated it is implied which would leave it out of our control if someone at that point skims over the "possibility" and "implies". Implications are never facts, so there is no reason to claim I'm spreading misinformation as it being a possibility.

That's like telling me I'm spreading misinformation that a two sided coin will possibly land on heads.