BigBuggyBastage 
"[@Nightweaver20xx":](/images/2324341#comment_8967103
)
It's a wonderful thought. :D
But I very much doubt it. Although a human may be able to create something that_*sounds_* very much like a modem to our own ears, the signaling rates and frequencies specified for communication, even at one of the lowest baud rates, e.g. Hayes command set & Bell 103 modulation at 100 or 300 baud, would simply be unattainable.
Example:
[bq]
> The Bell 103 modem used audio frequency-shift keying to encode data. Different pairs of audio frequencies were used by each station:
>
> • The originating station used a mark tone of 1,270 Hz and a space tone of 1,070 Hz.
> • The answering station used a mark tone of 2,225 Hz and a space tone of 2,025 Hz.
"
>
> [Source":](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_103_modem
[/bq]
)
>
I just cannot see a human hitting and/or alternating between those exact frequencies at 300, let alone 100, times per second, accurately, each and every time.
[@Altair the dragon-horse](/images/2324341#comment_8967164)
Oh man, remember the echo problem?
Go fsck yourself
It's a wonderful thought. :D
But I very much doubt it. Although a human may be able to create something that
Example:
[bq]
> The Bell 103 modem used audio frequency-shift keying to encode data. Different pairs of audio frequencies were used by each station:
>
> • The originating station used a mark tone of 1,270 Hz and a space tone of 1,070 Hz.
> • The answering station used a mark tone of 2,225 Hz and a space tone of 2,025 Hz.
"
>
> [Source
[/bq]
>
I just cannot see a human hitting and/or alternating between those exact frequencies at 300, let alone 100, times per second, accurately, each and every time.
[@Altair the dragon-horse](/images/2324341#comment_8967164)
Oh man, remember the echo problem?