Ereiam 
"[@15InchBic":](/images/2278201#comment_8822759
[bq="15InchBic"]) "
> [@Background Pony #4AEF":](/images/2278201#comment_8822719
)
> Obviously I need to spell it out for you, so here it is.[/bq]
Fine, let's try that again.
[bq="15InchBic"]
> "Applejack's Plantation," a picture depicting Applejack as a pre-American Civil War plantation owner smugly lording over clearly enslaved zebras which are allegories for black people in MLP: FiM, is racist and so is any derivative that doesn't either A.) Turn it completely on its' head, or B.) Crank the absurdity to 11.[/bq]
So far, so good (although your definition of the exceptions to racism seem a tad reductive to me, but whatevs).
[bq="15InchBic"]
> This does neither. It takes an unaltered image of slave-owner AJ and puts her to the backdrop of a scene in a movie while changing nothing about her attire or facial expression.[/bq]
And here's where your argument breaks down, because, stripped of its original context (which attached the "slave-owner" label to it), the leftover image of "smug AJ in a white costume", as it appears, works when transposed into the context of the movie, and thus constitutes a valid example of the aforementioned case A.
[bq="15InchBic"]
> To deny that is to deny the tide, and to do so puts you somewhere between "the Moon Landing was faked" and "Obama turned frogs gay" on the scale of "If you believe this, you are_*stupid."_
*
>
> You can perform all the mental gymnastics you want to convince yourself that a McDonald's Big Mac is a ribeye steak._*It's still a Big Mac._* [/bq]
And now you resort to false equivalences and hyperboles, thus finalizing the self-destruction of your own argument.
Sorry, you fail again (at least it was useful to pinpoint how said failure occurs).
Monde de merde
[bq="15InchBic"]
> [@Background Pony #4AEF
> Obviously I need to spell it out for you, so here it is.
Fine, let's try that again.
[bq="15InchBic"]
> "Applejack's Plantation," a picture depicting Applejack as a pre-American Civil War plantation owner smugly lording over clearly enslaved zebras which are allegories for black people in MLP: FiM, is racist and so is any derivative that doesn't either A.) Turn it completely on its' head, or B.) Crank the absurdity to 11.
So far, so good (although your definition of the exceptions to racism seem a tad reductive to me, but whatevs).
[bq="15InchBic"]
> This does neither. It takes an unaltered image of slave-owner AJ and puts her to the backdrop of a scene in a movie while changing nothing about her attire or facial expression.
And here's where your argument breaks down, because, stripped of its original context (which attached the "slave-owner" label to it), the leftover image of "smug AJ in a white costume"
[bq="15InchBic"]
> To deny that is to deny the tide, and to do so puts you somewhere between "the Moon Landing was faked" and "Obama turned frogs gay" on the scale of "If you believe this, you are
>
> You can perform all the mental gymnastics you want to convince yourself that a McDonald's Big Mac is a ribeye steak.
And now you resort to false equivalences and hyperboles, thus finalizing the self-destruction of your own argument.
Sorry, you fail again (at least it was useful to pinpoint how said failure occurs).