Cosoca 
"[@Atlas_66":](/images/2003883#comment_8886251
)
The problem here is that you are making a distinction without a tangible difference and it seems to be flying right over your head. Saying "Real communism hasn't been tried" is like saying "a person flying by jumping off a roof with an umbrella hasn't actually been tried" because "gravitic interference is why he fell and broke his neck, that wasn't real flying", just because it may be strictly speaking "possible" in some unrealistic and outlandish fashion does not mean it will ever actually happen.
Communism as defined by Marx will never exist, it will always turn into "state capitalism" because that is what is necessary for a communist state to persist just like how fascism will always require imperialism to exist, the reality of human nature ensures that this will never change.
Wind blows, rain falls and communist regimes will always turn into oppressive authoritarian shit holes because if they didn't they would cease to exist.
If you'd like to discuss the nuances of this I'd be happy to but tbh this comment section is already nuts, I don't want to antagonize anyone in here anymore than has already been done.
Edit: I'd also just like to point out that I am not actually disagreeing with you, I just wanted to point out the issue with tolerating this sort of fallacy in rational conversation.
*Blocks Your Path*
The problem here is that you are making a distinction without a tangible difference and it seems to be flying right over your head. Saying "Real communism hasn't been tried" is like saying "a person flying by jumping off a roof with an umbrella hasn't actually been tried" because "gravitic interference is why he fell and broke his neck, that wasn't real flying", just because it may be strictly speaking "possible" in some unrealistic and outlandish fashion does not mean it will ever actually happen.
Communism as defined by Marx will never exist, it will always turn into "state capitalism" because that is what is necessary for a communist state to persist just like how fascism will always require imperialism to exist, the reality of human nature ensures that this will never change.
Wind blows, rain falls and communist regimes will always turn into oppressive authoritarian shit holes because if they didn't they would cease to exist.
If you'd like to discuss the nuances of this I'd be happy to but tbh this comment section is already nuts, I don't want to antagonize anyone in here anymore than has already been done.
Edit: I'd also just like to point out that I am not actually disagreeing with you, I just wanted to point out the issue with tolerating this sort of fallacy in rational conversation.