Everything is better than a fluffy in abuseverse.
 
By example, if you’re a fluffy abuser then you can’t just be a normal guy or a psycho, you must be a dark hero with superpowers who protects the world torturing fluffies. And abusers still will find it logical.

Stop reading the comments sections.

@LordAnubis Ugh, don’t remind me. Over on Fluffybooru Menthol is giving me grief about how supposedly, the idea of Fluffies being weak and etc is the accepted canon of Fluffy Ponies, which is really stupid in and of itself. While I love Fluffy Ponies and the idea behind them, I’m starting to get sick and disgusted with the whole fandom behind it. Any suggestions on what I can do to not be so “bordering on abandoning the fandom” disgusted?

^Because abusers are gleefully hypocritical and contradictory. Don’t look for logic there, you will find none.  
I’m okay with puffy griffons if they’re used for more than just little fluffy predators. Nora’s story is a case of a puffy griffon used for a creative premise.

…I’m sorry, but I can’t enjoy Nora’s story, as I find the idea of Puffy Griffins to be one of the worst hypocrisies of this fandom.
 
Why exactly is it okay for something like the Puffy Griffin to have relatively-normal speech and near-adult-human intellect, but not Fluffies? Why is it okay for Puffy Griffins to be able to actually defend themselves and not be completely fragile, while if someone did the same for Fluffies, people here would cry bloody murder?
 
It just is disgusting and hypocritical. If Puffy Griffins are able to actually be intelligent and capable of legitimate self-defense, why can’t Fluffy Ponies?