Uploaded by Yoshimon1
1226x1298 JPG 167 kBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH safe2284191 +-SH artist:tjpones4129 +-SH oc1008355 +-SH oc only737800 +-SH oc:tjpones180 +-SH pony1717685 +-SH black and white18980 +-SH bust84331 +-SH dialogue101476 +-SH ear piercing49652 +-SH faic15306 +-SH fake smile230 +-SH foam finger276 +-SH grayscale52497 +-SH hide the pain harold11 +-SH lineart25042 +-SH male592458 +-SH monochrome181542 +-SH piercing71246 +-SH smiling437801 +-SH solo1517560 +-SH stallion215106 +-SH suddenly hands435 +-SH sweat44649 +-SH thumbs up1477 +-SH traditional art150108
Loading...
Loading...
[Thinks about it a little too hard]
Brain… hurting…
Lemme throw you an example your way. Imagine I’m showing you a guy who draws vore. This guy is a fetish artist. He draws this one particular fetish and it’s posted on his profile at this adult art forum thing. Notice that he’s into vore. See how he primarily draws mouths? Notice that the mouths (which he draws primarily) have been given greater focus than the rest of the parts of the body he’s drawing? Because he draws this fetish? Notice the detail you see in the mouth that is only ever drawn for this fetish and is not, under normal circumstances, included in drawings that do not focus exclusively on the mouth. Notice the drool. Notice the way each tooth is drawn. See that uvula and the back of the throat? These are all things that are typically included in this guy’s vore art because those are parts of the fetish that appeal to people with a vore fetish. These are not typically included in non-vore drawings because the detail is not required because the focus is not JUST on the mouth, and the focus is on the rest of the picture. If you continue to look at this artist’s works, you’ll notice that the parts of the drawings that aren’t mouths are of lower quality, because the fetish artist is not focused on drawing not-vore. Imagine making a character in an RPG and you have a number of skill points; he invested most of his in “can draw mouths” and the skills of “can draw hands” “can draw torsos” “can shade properly” “likes backgrounds” have very few points in them. This is all because he is a vore fetishist and his work is primarily mouth-related.
Now imagine this man is trying to draw an entire body and doesn’t want this drawing to be sexual in nature. He’s going to draw this figure striking a pose with its mouth open in a silent cheer of excitement. Observe the overall quality of the figure. Because of his focus on one body part in particular, his ability to draw other body parts has suffered because of the sheer number of times he did not draw legs and arms and full figures. He does not have as much practice drawing arms and legs and full figures, so they lack detail or do not look as good as the mouth he’s drawing. And since this is the only way he knows how to draw mouths, the casual viewer of this SFW image will notice that the mouth has a lot of detail. The viewer can see a bit of drool stretching between the incredibly detailed individual teeth. The viewer can see the uvula undulating in the back. The viewer can see the rippling flesh of the inner-cheek. Meanwhile, the artist has pretty much just planted the head on a stick figure body. That’s because he doesn’t have as much practice drawing bodies or any part of the body that isn’t a mouth. That’s because he’s a fetish artist who draws vore. The man is trying his best to draw something SFW, but he’s drawing what he knows, and it shows in his SFW art. Maybe nobody’s being eaten, but the detail he reserves for his fetish work is there, and the practice he did NOT get in drawing not-vore-related parts also shows.
It’s not hard to grasp this. An artist who is trying to learn how to draw body parts will generally not go into the insane detail that a fetish artist will because they have limited time to invest in drawing and they don’t want to be the guy who knows how to draw two arms, a torso, and then the rest is stick figure body parts. There are a few artists who do this because they have an incredibly strong interest/desire to learn how to draw incredible detail, but they are few and far between and cannot be used to “prove” this explanation wrong. If one man out of 10 billion does X-thing and I’m trying to explain that men typically do Y-thing, you can’t say “oh yeah well i found a guy who doesn’t do y-thing so that means you’re wrong. checkmate atheists”.
I don’t know how else to put this. Fetish artists draw their fetish well, and since they have not practiced drawing much else, their work in the areas they did not practice much suffers. The resultant SFW image reflects the time and energy he put into learning how to draw different body parts. PLEASE PLEASE tell me you guys understand this. Because I feel like I’m showing you guys an image of a man pointing a gun at a dead body, and there’s smoke coming out of the gun, and there are people here going “well maybe somebody put smoke powder in the gun and the man just happened to be pointing it at a body that’s bleeding on the ground from a gunshot wound. We don’t know what happened for sure”.
That just happens sometimes. You start with one area of a drawing, a face or arm or something, and it could end up in a different level of detail than another area. Moreso when the artist doesn’t mind tracing. 80s animation is full of that stuff. Detailed mouth? Like an attempt to draw a Bruce Timm girl’s lips onto a pic of Sunset Shimmer?
@Background Pony #0602
I’m talking about how something like mouths or feet are much higher quality than the rest of the art, due to the artist drawing those parts much more and in greater detail than the rest of the body.
Thank you. How can people really say drawing something detailed means its a fetish? No that means the artist wants to improve their work and show off better art. A lot of fetish art isnt that particularly detailed either.
No, he’s right. Foot fetish has become the go-to for “you’re into some weird stuff.” in media. The centuries of fetish meaning “a party at the lingerie and riding crops club” seems to have passed. And now everyone doesn’t know what’s going on, just that that thing over there that they don’t get must be someone’s fetish.
You think so?
You have a very aggressive misunderstanding of what’s being said.
The problem is when their fetish leaks through to their SFW art in a way.
Hrmmm touché good sir….touché
Like TJPones said, not hating on kinks; hating on the phenomena of artist doing a real bad job hiding their kinks.
Too be fair, if someone draws mouths noticeably more detailed than the rest of the character, or feet, it’s safe to assume that they are a fetish artist.
It’s the same thing!I won’t judge you for your opinion. :U
Whats the difference? Judging by the one comment going into detail bout this, the people who believe this really dont form a solid argument.
“oh a foot is showing? Must be fetish stuff amirite?”
Edited
Now thats very complex. Well its not really anyones duty to police the web for kinkshamers.
Im throwing shade at badly disguised kinks
But what if I don’t shame you for kinkshaming, @Aperture_pony ? xD
Ha ha! xD
“They cant kinkshame you if thats also your kink!”
Edited