@chucklefarts  
Yeah, most gymnasts go through a routine of contortions. I just stand in place in my asshole stance and fill up time.

@D50  
That’s some strange mental gymnastics, but ok.

@chucklefarts  
It’s either sarcasm or an invitation to move the discussion to the politics thread. I choose sarcasm and will openly dismiss any attempt at treating the comment as legitimate.

@D50  
is not sarcasm m8

@chucklefarts  
/s

@Rain1234  
I honestly think that Youtube and/or the advertisers behind youtube are actively trying to strangle independent media organizations that cannot be controlled by the establishment.
 
“Dangerous” ideas are being propagated on Youtube that counter the attempted monopoly of information that the establishment tries to maintain. This scourge of independent thinkers that dominate the monologue format that the Youtube platform allows, directly threatens the power of those that want to monopolize the control of information and by extension attempt to control your mind.
 
The “Tech Left” strangle the flow of information of those on youtubefacebooktwitter that propagate “problematic” ideas and promote those that propagate ideas that they favor. This topic is VERY political. These companies are attempting to control how people think by controlling the flow of information on their dominant platforms.
 
This is essentially mind control on a mass scale. This is not a science fiction movie, this is the world you live in. In a way, they are almost more powerful than government. Trump, in a way, was a rebellion against this virtual monopoly of information control. In the wake of their failure, they have stepped up their information control leading to the “adpocolypse” and other forms of censorship, becoming more overt and obvious in their mind control mechanisms under the guise of policing “hate speech” and what they deem to be fake news.

+6

@chucklefarts  
Well… Obviously they do and try to force us to like stuff we don’t really want to see, hoping to lower our standards so we accept casual quality as good, but the sheep will fight the farmer!

@MrNeo  
Well… I consider 3 factors to be fault:
 
Pewds: made a joke that could easily be but into the news, people (maybe) knew it was a joke but news saw it as a way of cash in (WSJ)
 
News: needing attention getting headlines it says Pewds is a natzy, but business owners saw this and thought :“o’shit, my plant farm ads are played on mass shooting videos”
 
Youtube:made the ad giving quantity >quality, so of course, people started making click bait thumbnails of unoriginal content and youtube wasn’t able to day “one time thing, it happens”
 
Honestly youtube, did you think going quantity>quality was a good idea? Not it’s the apocalypse and all ads are 5 sec so you get any money at all but of course I use a block :) I do disable it in derpibooru.org (most of the time) good content creators (if only good content gets ads, then the bad content will die out and its quality >quantity again) and… Thats it… Also I spoke way too much

@chucklefarts  
+5

The most evil item in existence: The Youtube Behelit.

It was probably a PewDiePie video.

@chucklefarts  
+4

“to correct some mistake” yeah. Better gif quality and no watermark of mp4 to gif converting site.

@Background Pony #DC21  
The image in the stone is a YouTube video that has been blocked or removed. I noticed that the image was uploaded a second time to correct some mistake, so I was wondering if the video was supposed to work or if it was intentional that the video was not available.

@Background Pony #9FF5  
I’ve been waiting for it to happened, if it does, it can have one instant like for sure.

Glimmering Spectacle - It’s too obvious, but someone will do this anyway (probably).

Men In Black edit when?

Your body language is quite telling.

“Was the YouTube video supposed to work” I don’t understand what are you talking about.

Was the YouTube video supposed to work, or was that part of the joke?

@chucklefarts  
+2

@chucklefarts  
+1

I don’t like how GoogleYoutube seem to be enforcing their political ideas upon those who disagree with them.