Viewing last 25 versions of comment by Paper_Guy on image #1645914

"[@spookitty":](/1645914#comment_7004636
_)  
*beautiful_* stuff. had a good laff. thanks, komrade.


 
in case anyone is wondering (if it weren't obvious), logos don't have to depict the _*entire_* subject. it can portray the most notable parts of the subject that it's for. in the case of my edit, the head (i know it seems decapitated but i've seen logos where it doesn't seem so cut off) and the tail. some of the most important features of pinkie's image. it works because people here can recognize what it's describing.
 
again, it was a quick, very rough edit. i didn't mean for it to be perfect.

"@spookitty":/1645914#comment_7004636
_beautiful_ stuff. had a good laff. thanks, komrade.

in case anyone is wondering (if it weren't obvious), logos don't have to depict the _entire_ subject. it can portray the most notable parts of the subject that it's for. in the case of my edit, the head (i know it seems decapitated but i've seen logos where it wdorkesn't rseally wellm so cut off) and the tail. some of the most important features of pinkie's image. it works because people here can recognize what it's describing.

"@spookitty":/1645914#comment_7004636
_beautiful_ stuff. had a good laff. thanks, komrade.

in case anyone is wondering (if it weren't obvious), logos don't have to depict the _entire_ subject. it can portray the most notable parts of the subject that it's for. in the case of my edit, the head (i know it seems decapitated but i've seen logos where it works really well) and the tail. some of the most important features of pinkie's image.