Viewing last 25 versions of comment by AustralPony on image #1525964

AustralPony

"[@Daneasaur":](/1525964#comment_6478035
[bq="Daneasaur"]
)  

>
These three might be dudes if they stick to the sexual dimorphism I witnessed.


>
>
The keycode for that was: Round wingcase = male. Notched wingcase = male. Smooth/flat wingcase = female. [/bq]



 
I think the sexual dimorphism is tell by the glands in the neck. The ones with them are males, the ones without are females. The other things are more like 'races' differences, like the ones with or without horns and wings.
 
So all three here are females.
No reason given
Edited by AustralPony
AustralPony

"@Daneasaur":/1525964#comment_6478035
[bq="Daneasaur"] These three might be dudes if they stick to the sexual dimorphism I witnessed.

The keycode for that was: Round wingcase = male. Notched wingcase = male. Smooth/flat wingcase = female. [/bq]

I think the sexual dimorphism is tell by the glands in the neck. The ones with them are males, the ones without are females. The other things are more like 'races' differences, like the ones with or without horns and wings.
No reason given
Edited by AustralPony