Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
No description provided.
Immanuel Kant was a real pissant
Who was very rarely stable.
(Waits for the rest…)
His most important contributions were in defining what “art” is. Such as:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Schopenhauer%27s_aesthetics
I try my damnedest to cut through what looked like contradictions (which I don’t think was normal for an 18 year old), but essentially he seemed like an okay guy who just wanted individuals to be their own people. Which is noble in theory, but not really implemented well for a social species.
I never read Schopenhauer before, though.
Never been a fan of Neitzche. Seems douches like to take his quotes out of context as much as possible.
It’s painful to try and decipher what he really is saying.
I think it was from “The Critique of Practical Reason.”
I’m not a big Kant guy, so maybe not.