Viewing last 25 versions of comment by Starry Mind on image #1319092

"[@mathprofbrony":](/1319092#comment_5701138
)  
I see no reason why they taught us @`i@` in algebra class. It has no reachable value, so why should anyone, except for theoretical mathematicians, even need to know about how to reach it? To me, it seems about equally as important as knowing the length of a "[potrzebie":](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potrzebie#System_of_measurement).


 
Oh my, why did I rant about i?


 
Despite my malicious hatred toward imaginary numbers, you gave a great explanation. :)P

"@mathprofbrony":/1319092#comment_5701138
I see no reason why they taught us @i@ in algebra class. It has no reachable value, so why should anyone, except for theoretical mathematicians, even need to know about how to reach it? To me, it seems about equally as important as knowing the length of a "potrzebie":https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potrzebie#System_of_measurement.

Oh my, why did I rant about i?

ODespite my malicious h,atred towanrd imaginary numbers, you gave a great explanation. :)

"@mathprofbrony":/1319092#comment_5701138
I see no reason why they taught us @i@ in algebra class. It has no reachable value, so why should anyone, except for theoretical mathematicians, even need to know about how to reach it? To me, it seems about equally as important as knowing the length of a "potrzebie":https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potrzebie#System_of_measurement.

Oh my, why did I rant about i?

Oh, and great explanation. :)

"@mathprofbrony":/1319092#comment_5701138
I see no reason why they taught us @i@ in algebra class. It has no reachable value, so why should anyone, except for theoretical mathematicians, even need to know about how to reach it? To me, it seems about equally as important as knowing the length of a "potrzebie":https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potrzebie#System_of_measurement.

Oh my, why did I rant about i?