Technical Maintenance on Saturday, December 7, between 09:00 and 12:00 UTC. The site will be unavailable during that time.

Viewing last 25 versions of comment by Background Pony #0D1B on image #1258919

Background Pony #0D1B
"[@Flying Pancake":](/1258919#comment_5721998
[bq="Flying
) Pancake"] 

>
" [@Background Pony #E352":](/1258919#comment_5721034
)
>
I'm not sure my assumption was wrong, but looking at it now, my measurements definitely were. I'm coming up with either 6' or 6' 1'' for Luna and 6' 9'' or 6' 10'' for Celestia (without heels), depending on whether Fluttershy is 5' 5'' or 5' 6''.


>
>
What are you basing her height on? I'd just been using the same height that >>1162182 used for the EQG to pony scaling comparison. [/bq]

 
You know that this EqG to pony scale comparison is wrong, the pony is not that big, should be smaller. like here >>1146871
No reason given
Edited by Background Pony #0D1B
Background Pony #0D1B
"@Flying Pancake":/1258919#comment_5721998
[bq="Flying Pancake"] "@Background Pony #E352":/1258919#comment_5721034
I'm not sure my assumption was wrong, but looking at it now, my measurements definitely were. I'm coming up with either 6' or 6' 1'' for Luna and 6' 9'' or 6' 10'' for Celestia (without heels), depending on whether Fluttershy is 5' 5'' or 5' 6''.

What are you basing her height on? I'd just been using the same height that >>1162182 used for the EQG to pony scaling comparison. [/bq]
You know that this EqG to pony scalonye comparison is wrong, the pony kis not that big, should be smaller.
No reason given
Edited by Background Pony #0D1B
Background Pony #0D1B
"@Flying Pancake":/1258919#comment_5721998
[bq="Flying Pancake"] "@Background Pony #E352":/1258919#comment_5721034
I'm not sure my assumption was wrong, but looking at it now, my measurements definitely were. I'm coming up with either 6' or 6' 1'' for Luna and 6' 9'' or 6' 10'' for Celestia (without heels), depending on whether Fluttershy is 5' 5'' or 5' 6''.

What are you basing her height on? I'd just been using the same height that >>1162182 used for the EQG to pony scaling comparison. [/bq]
You know that this EqG to pony scalony comparison is wrong, the pony ks not that big, should be smaller.
No reason given
Edited by Background Pony #0D1B